DOJ-OGR-00000139.tif
39.9 KB
Extraction Summary
1
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document / court order / report
File Size:
39.9 KB
Summary
This document outlines a legal analysis regarding perjury charges against Maxwell, stemming from her deposition in a civil case. The Court found the perjury charges legally tenable, asserting that Maxwell's defenses should be left to the jury, and that the questions posed were not overly ambiguous to preclude a perjury charge.
People (1)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Maxwell | Defendant |
Her motion to dismiss perjury counts stemming from her answers in a civil case deposition.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit |
Cited in legal precedents (2d Cir. 1986, 2d Cir. 1970)
|
Relationships (1)
Maxwell's motion to dismiss perjury counts
Key Quotes (5)
"The perjury charges are legally tenable"Source
DOJ-OGR-00000139.tif
Quote #1
"The Court concludes that the charges are legally tenable and Maxwell's defenses are appropriately left to the jury."Source
DOJ-OGR-00000139.tif
Quote #2
"Testimony is perjurious only if it is knowingly false and is material to the proceeding in which the defendant offered it."Source
DOJ-OGR-00000139.tif
Quote #3
"The questions posed were not too ambiguous to support a perjury charge"Source
DOJ-OGR-00000139.tif
Quote #4
"A question is fundamentally ambiguous only if reasonable people could not agree on its meaning in context."Source
DOJ-OGR-00000139.tif
Quote #5
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document