DOJ-OGR-00010464.jpg
619 KB
Extraction Summary
1
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
0
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing (sentencing memorandum)
File Size:
619 KB
Summary
This document is page 17 (PDF page 18) of a sentencing memorandum filed on June 15, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It outlines the legal standards for sentencing under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), citing Supreme Court precedents like Gall and Nelson. The text argues that these statutory factors, specifically the need for just punishment and Ms. Maxwell's history, weigh heavily in favor of the proposed sentence.
People (1)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the sentencing memorandum; the text argues that sentencing factors weigh heavily in favor of a specific se...
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Supreme Court |
Cited as legal authority (Gall, Nelson cases).
|
|
| United States District Court |
Implied recipient of the filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE).
|
|
| Department of Justice (DOJ) |
Indicated by the Bates stamp 'DOJ-OGR'.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-06-15
Filing of Document 663 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
United States District Court
Ms. Maxwell
Legal Counsel
Key Quotes (3)
"a district court “may not presume that a sentence within the applicable Guidelines range is reasonable.”"Source
DOJ-OGR-00010464.jpg
Quote #1
"impose a sentence that is “sufficient, but not greater than necessary” to meet the objectives of sentencing."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010464.jpg
Quote #2
"the § 3553(a) factors—including Ms. Maxwell’s “history and characteristics,”... weigh heavily in favor of a sentence"Source
DOJ-OGR-00010464.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document