DOJ-OGR-00019624.jpg
676 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
8
Organizations
0
Locations
0
Events
0
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal brief / court filing (page 17 of 37)
File Size:
676 KB
Summary
Page 17 of a legal filing (Case 20-3061, dated Oct 2, 2020) produced by the DOJ. The text contains legal arguments citing various precedents (Punn, Mohawk Indus., Hitchcock) to argue that appellate review should generally wait until a final judgment is entered, rather than allowing immediate interlocutory appeals, particularly regarding pre-trial discovery or evidence rulings.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Punn | Defendant in cited case law |
Cited in legal argument regarding appellate reversal (Punn, 737 F.3d).
|
| Hitchcock | Defendant in cited case law |
Cited in United States v. Hitchcock regarding refusal to seal documents.
|
| Risjord | Party in cited case law |
Cited in Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Risjord.
|
Organizations (8)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Department of Justice (DOJ) |
Indicated by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR.
|
|
| Mohawk Indus. |
Cited in legal precedent.
|
|
| Kensington Int’l Ltd. |
Cited in legal precedent.
|
|
| Republic of Congo |
Cited in legal precedent.
|
|
| Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. |
Cited in legal precedent.
|
|
| Supreme Court |
Referenced regarding the collateral order doctrine.
|
|
| 2d Cir. |
Second Circuit Court of Appeals cited in case law.
|
|
| 9th Cir. |
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals cited in case law.
|
Key Quotes (3)
"Instead, the decisive consideration is whether delaying review until the entry of final judgment would imperil a substantial public interest or some particular value of a high order."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019624.jpg
Quote #1
"In a criminal case, the availability of post-judgment relief through reversal or vacatur of conviction, if warranted, will generally be sufficient to protect whatever right a defendant claims was abridged by the district court’s pretrial decision."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019624.jpg
Quote #2
"When applying the collateral order doctrine, the Supreme Court has generally denied review of pretrial discovery orders."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019624.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document