DOJ-OGR-00009537.jpg

537 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

4
People
4
Organizations
3
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal correspondence / court filing (letter to judge)
File Size: 537 KB
Summary

This document is a letter dated January 13, 2022, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell*. The Government argues that a motion filed by Counsel for Juror 50 to intervene and obtain jury selection materials should be filed publicly without redactions, countering the defendant's objection that it is not a judicial document. The document references a previous court order from January 12, 2022, and cites legal precedent regarding public access to judicial documents.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Alison J. Nathan Judge
Recipient of the letter; United States District Court Judge.
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
Defendant in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell; opposes public filing of Juror 50's motion.
Juror 50 Juror
Subject of the motion to intervene regarding jury selection materials.
Counsel for Juror 50 Attorney
Filed a motion to intervene and obtain jury selection materials.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
U.S. Department of Justice
Header of the document.
United States Attorney Southern District of New York
Sender of the letter.
United States District Court Southern District of New York
Court handling the case.
Second Circuit
Cited as legal authority (Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga).

Timeline (3 events)

February 24, 2022
Date the document was officially filed (per header stamp).
Court Docket
January 12, 2022
Court Order directing parties to submit proposed redactions.
SDNY
Judge Alison J. Nathan
January 13, 2022
Submission of letter regarding Juror 50's motion redactions.
SDNY
US Attorney Judge Alison J. Nathan

Locations (3)

Location Context
Jurisdiction of the court and attorney's office.
Address of the US Attorney: One Saint Andrew's Plaza, New York, New York 10007.
Address of the Court: 40 Foley Square, New York, New York 10007.

Relationships (2)

Ghislaine Maxwell Legal Adversary/Subject Juror 50
Maxwell opposes the public filing of Juror 50's motion.
United States Attorney Prosecution vs Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell
Case title 'United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell'; Government calls defendant's argument 'meritless'.

Key Quotes (4)

"The Government respectfully submits that no redactions are necessary, and accordingly the motion should be publicly filed."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009537.jpg
Quote #1
"The defendant opposes any public filing of Juror 50’s motion, arguing that it is not a judicial document. This argument is meritless."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009537.jpg
Quote #2
"Juror 50’s motion to intervene is quite obviously 'relevant to the performance of a judicial function and useful in the judicial process.'"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009537.jpg
Quote #3
"Counsel for Juror 50 has filed a motion to intervene, and to obtain a copy of certain materials relating to jury selection."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009537.jpg
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document