HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014100.jpg
1.62 MB
Extraction Summary
2
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing (response/objections to document requests)
File Size:
1.62 MB
Summary
This page contains the 'General Objections' section of a legal filing (Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM) entered in the Southern District of Florida in 2015. The Defendant outlines five standard objections regarding the production of documents, citing relevance, admissibility, timing of discovery, attorney-client privilege, and undue burden. The document bears a House Oversight Committee bates stamp.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Defendant | Legal Party |
The party objecting to the document requests (likely Jeffrey Epstein based on case number context, though not explici...
|
| Plaintiffs | Legal Party |
The party propounding the document requests.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| FLSD |
United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (implied by docket header).
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Indicated by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.
|
Timeline (1 events)
Relationships (1)
Document discusses 'Document Request propounded by Plaintiffs' and 'Defendant further reserves the right to object'.
Key Quotes (3)
"Defendant objects to each Document Request to the extent that it calls for documents protected by the attorney-client privilege, the work-product doctrine, or any other applicable privilege or protection."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014100.jpg
Quote #1
"Defendant generally objects to the Document Requests as unduly burdensome and oppressive"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014100.jpg
Quote #2
"Defendant does not concede that any information requested is relevant to this action or admissible at trial."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014100.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document