FLSD
OrganizationRelationship Network
023-01.pdf
A legal certification filed on November 23, 2010, in the Florida Southern District Court (Case 9:10-cv-81111). Attorney Lilly Ann Sanchez, representing Jeffrey Epstein, certifies that she has conferred with plaintiff's counsel Bradley Edwards regarding a Motion to Strike and various other legal disputes including allegations of a fraudulent affidavit submitted by Epstein.
017-18.pdf
This document is a page from a court docket covering filings on June 29 and 30, 2010, in the case of Jane Doe vs. Jeffrey Epstein (Case 9:10-cv-81111-WPD). Key entries include orders by Judge Kenneth A. Marra granting an open trial and identifying Jane Doe, as well as denying Epstein's request to redact tax records. It also lists motions by Epstein's defense regarding jury selection, sequestration, and a request to continue the trial, alongside Plaintiff's motion for a writ regarding witness Alfredo Rodriguez.
052-03.pdf
This document is a legal declaration by Jane Doe No. 6, dated July 22, 2009. She states that on July 9, 2009, an investigator visited her former employer, A Affordable Auto Insurance in Lake Worth, Florida, asking personal questions about her. She expresses concern that Jeffrey Epstein is sending investigators to harass people she knows and potentially out her as a plaintiff in the sexual abuse lawsuit against him.
DOJ-OGR-00000304.jpg
This document is a signed affirmation by Jeffrey E. Epstein dated December 7, 2007, in which he re-affirms the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and Addendum dated October 30, 2007. The document was faxed from the law firm Fowler-White Burnett and was later included as an exhibit in multiple court cases, including the 2019 criminal case against him.
DOJ-OGR-00000303.jpg
This document is the signature page of an Addendum to Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement. It contains a certification that Epstein has read, understood, and agreed to comply with the clarifications to the agreement. The document is signed by Lilly Ann Sanchez, attorney for Epstein, on October 29, 2007, though it also lists signature blocks for U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta, A. Marie Villafaña, and Gerald Lefcourt.
DOJ-OGR-00000302.jpg
This document is a signature page for an Addendum to a Non-Prosecution Agreement involving Jeffrey Epstein. It contains a handwritten signature and date (10/29/07) by Gerald Lefcourt, Epstein's counsel. The text certifies that Epstein understands the clarifications to the agreement and agrees to comply, although Epstein's own signature line is blank on this specific page. The document was later filed in court in 2016 and 2019 as indicated by the headers.
DOJ-OGR-00000299.jpg
This document is the signature page (Page 7 of 7) of a Non-Prosecution Agreement involving Jeffrey Epstein. It features the signature of his attorney, Lilly Ann Sanchez, dated September 24, 2007. The document lists other key legal figures including U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta and defense attorney Gerald Lefcourt, certifying that Epstein understands and agrees to the conditions of the agreement.
DOJ-OGR-00020809.jpg
This document is a signed legal affirmation by Jeffrey E. Epstein dated December 7, 2007. In the document, Epstein formally re-affirms the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and Addendum dated October 30, 2007. The document was faxed from the law firm Fowler-White Burnett and later entered into the Florida Southern District docket in 2010.
DOJ-OGR-00020808.jpg
This document is a signature page for an addendum to a Non-Prosecution Agreement concerning Jeffrey Epstein. It confirms Epstein's understanding and agreement to the terms. The document is signed on October 29, 2007, by Lilly Ann Sanchez, an attorney for Epstein, and on October 30, 2007, by a representative for the U.S. Attorney's office.
DOJ-OGR-00020804.jpg
This document is the signature page (Page 7 of 7) of a Non-Prosecution Agreement involving Jeffrey Epstein. It contains a statement certifying Epstein understands and agrees to the conditions. While signature blocks exist for Epstein, R. Alexander Acosta, A. Marie Villafaña, and Gerald Lefcourt, only Lilly Ann Sanchez (Attorney for Epstein) has signed and dated the document (9-24-07).
DOJ-OGR-00004655.jpg
This document is the signature page (Page 7 of 7) of the Non-Prosecution Agreement between the United States and Jeffrey Epstein. It features Jeffrey Epstein's signature dated September 24, 2007, acknowledging he understands the conditions of the agreement. The document lists R. Alexander Acosta (U.S. Attorney) and Epstein's defense counsel, Gerald Lefcourt and Lilly Ann Sanchez, though they have not signed this specific copy.
DOJ-OGR-00005544.jpg
This document is a signed legal affirmation dated December 7, 2007, faxed from the law firm Fowler-White Burnett. In the document, Jeffrey Epstein explicitly re-affirms the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and Addendum dated October 30, 2007. The document bears court filing stamps from 2010 and 2021, indicating it was used as an exhibit in later litigation.
DOJ-OGR-00005530.jpg
This document is a cover page for 'Composite Exhibit A,' identified as the 'Non-Prosecution Agreement and Addendum.' It bears a Bates stamp 'DOJ-OGR-00005530' indicating it originated from a Department of Justice Office of Government Relations release. The header contains overlapping court filing stamps from the Southern District of Florida (FLSD), indicating the document was filed in multiple cases or refiled, with visible dates of 05/17/2019 and 10/29/2021.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013478.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal filing entered on June 28, 2010, in the case of Doe v. Epstein (Case No. 08-CIV-80893). Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys request a court order for a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Linnea R. Johnson or further mediation with Rodney Romano before July 1, 2010. The Rule 7.1 Certification indicates that the Plaintiff's counsel opposes this request, stating that mediation requirements have already been met.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013477.jpg
This court document, filed on June 28, 2010, updates the court on the status of Doe v. Epstein. It reports that since mediation on April 5, 2010, Jeffrey Epstein has resolved/settled numerous lawsuits, including cases involving C.L., C.M.A., and multiple Jane Does, leaving only the current federal case and two state court cases unresolved, all represented by Brad Edwards. The document also notes the extensive scope of the upcoming trial, citing over 170 potential witnesses and 140 exhibits.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014098.jpg
This document is a 'Counsel List' exhibit filed on March 24, 2015, in the Florida Southern District Court (Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM), related to the state case 'Edwards, Bradley vs. Dershowitz' (Case No.: CACE 15-000072). It lists contact information for Thomas Emerson Scott, Jr. of the law firm Cole Scott & Kissane P.A., identifying him as the attorney for the Defendant (Dershowitz). The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014091.jpg
A legal motion filed on March 24, 2015, in Broward County Circuit Court by plaintiffs Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell against Alan M. Dershowitz. The plaintiffs seek to compel Dershowitz to produce documents he claims to possess that prove he did not sexually abuse 'Jane Doe No. 3,' noting that he has refused a discovery request for over 45 days. The document is marked with a House Oversight stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014088.jpg
This document is the conclusion page of a legal filing (Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM) dated March 24, 2015, submitted by attorneys Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell on behalf of Jane Does No. 1-4. The text argues that the Court should deny Alan Dershowitz's motion to intervene, citing his conflicting positions regarding the possession and collection of records. The document includes contact information for the attorneys and bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014086.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM) arguing that Alan Dershowitz has failed to produce exculpatory documentary evidence in court despite publicly claiming on Fox News that such evidence exists to disprove Jane Doe No. 3's sexual misconduct allegations. The filing references a parallel state defamation case (*Edwards v. Dershowitz*) where Dershowitz also allegedly refused discovery requests. It suggests the court should infer the evidence does not exist and that the accuser's allegations are true.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014116.jpg
This document is page 5 of a legal letter dated February 25, 2015, regarding discovery disputes in the case Edwards and Cassell v. Dershowitz. The text criticizes the Defendant (Dershowitz) for providing evasive, incomplete, or legally unfounded responses to interrogatories concerning his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, statements made about Bradley Edwards, and potential witnesses. It specifically notes that Dershowitz refused to provide details based on flight logs or the deposition status of Jane Doe #3, and lists Thomas and Joanne Ashe as individuals identified by the Defendant.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014115.jpg
This document is page 4 of a legal letter dated February 25, 2015, from the law firm SDBS to Thomas E. Scott, Jr., regarding the case *Edwards and Cassell v. Dershowitz*. The letter aggressively challenges the defense's discovery responses, accusing them of 'word play and gamesmanship' regarding document production, metadata, and definitions. The sender demands immediate production of documents and rejects the defense's attempts to limit discovery to a narrow timeframe, arguing that Dershowitz's alleged defamation and public denials were broad and unrestricted by time.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014114.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal letter dated February 25, 2015, addressed to Thomas E. Scott, Jr. regarding the case *Edwards and Cassell v. Dershowitz*. The text outlines legal arguments concerning discovery abuses, specifically arguing that one cannot claim privilege or undue burden for documents that do not exist, and providing a broad legal definition of 'control' over documents to include those held by third parties like attorneys or accountants. The document was entered on the FLSD Docket on March 24, 2015, and bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014111.jpg
This document is a Certificate of Service filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM). It certifies that attorneys Thomas E. Scott and Steven R. Safra of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A. served legal documents on behalf of their client, Alan M. Dershowitz, to plaintiff's counsel Jack Scarola via E-Serve on February 23, 2015. The document bears a House Oversight stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014110.jpg
This document is the signature page of a legal filing (Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM) entered on March 24, 2015. It lists the legal counsel representing Alan M. Dershowitz, including attorneys from Wiley Rein LLP, Sweder & Ross, LLP, and Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A. The text confirms the defendant's agreement to produce responsive, non-privileged documents.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014109.jpg
This legal document is a response by a Defendant to document requests in the case *Jane Doe No. 1 v. United States* (Case 9:08-cv-80736). The Defendant objects to providing travel records from 1998-2007, limiting the scope to 1999-2002 based on Jane Doe #3's allegations that she was Epstein's 'sex slave' during that period before escaping to Australia. The Defendant also objects to producing communications with Jeffrey Epstein from late 2014 to 2015 regarding the sexual misconduct allegations, claiming attorney-client privilege and lack of relevance.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity