DOJ-OGR-00005718.jpg
679 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing (motion/memorandum of law)
File Size:
679 KB
Summary
This document is Page 6 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) arguing against the admissibility of a specific document compilation. The text details how former Epstein employee Alfredo Rodriguez attempted to sell 97 pages of evidence to lawyer Brad Edwards in 2009, leading to an FBI sting operation where Rodriguez sold the documents to an undercover officer for $50,000. The filing argues these documents are unauthenticated hearsay, lack relevance to the current indictment, and should be excluded.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alfredo Rodriguez | Former Epstein employee |
Deceased; attempted to sell document compilation to Brad Edwards in 2009; subject of a criminal complaint and FBI sting.
|
| Brad Edwards | Lawyer |
Involved in suing Epstein in 2009; approached by Rodriguez to buy evidence.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Defendant (mentioned) |
Subject of lawsuits and evidence offered by Rodriguez.
|
| Undercover officer | Law Enforcement |
FBI agent who received the 97 pages from Rodriguez in exchange for money during a sting.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| FBI |
Set up a sting operation to acquire documents from Rodriguez.
|
|
| United States Government |
Prosecution; the filing argues against the Government's claims regarding the documents.
|
|
| Southern District of Florida (S.D. Fla) |
Court where United States v. Rodriguez was filed.
|
Timeline (2 events)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction of the Rodriguez case.
|
Relationships (2)
Described as 'former Epstein employee'
Described as 'one of the lawyers who was involved in suing Mr. Epstein in 2009'
Key Quotes (5)
"The provenance of the exhibit is particularly troubling."Source
DOJ-OGR-00005718.jpg
Quote #1
"A sting operation was set up by the FBI during which the 97 pages were provided to an undercover officer in exchange for $50,000."Source
DOJ-OGR-00005718.jpg
Quote #2
"what is clear, however, is that they are neither authentic nor relevant."Source
DOJ-OGR-00005718.jpg
Quote #3
"It is also obvious that the documents are hearsay..."Source
DOJ-OGR-00005718.jpg
Quote #4
"Thus, who may or may not be the author of whatever ended up as these photocopies is not evidence that can or should be considered by any jury in this matter."Source
DOJ-OGR-00005718.jpg
Quote #5
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document