DOJ-OGR-00016120.jpg
570 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
570 KB
Summary
This document is page 10 of a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, for Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The text details a discussion between attorneys (Ms. Moe and Ms. Sternheim) and the Judge regarding the logistics of projecting evidence on screens for a witness. The primary concerns raised are ensuring the government can follow the proceedings and preventing the public gallery from viewing the screens to maintain privacy.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Moe | Attorney |
Addressing the court regarding procedural concerns about evidence presentation and public visibility.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, ruling on how evidence will be shown to witnesses.
|
| Ms. Sternheim | Attorney |
Defense attorney (likely representing Ghislaine Maxwell based on case context), clarifying seating arrangements and s...
|
| Ms. Lundberg | Unknown/Legal Team |
Mentioned as sitting in a specific location in the courtroom.
|
| Ms. Menninger | Unknown/Legal Team |
Used as a reference point for seating location.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| DOJ |
Indicated by footer 'DOJ-OGR'
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
Court proceeding regarding Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Discussion concerns the logistics of displaying digital evidence to a witness and ensuring the public gallery cannot view sensitive screens.
Courtroom
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction implied by court reporter name (Southern District of New York)
|
|
|
Physical location of the proceedings
|
Relationships (2)
Sternheim explains where Lundberg will be sitting.
Sternheim uses Menninger's location to describe Lundberg's seating.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document