Ms. Lundberg
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 |
DOJ-OGR-00017635.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It details the cross-examination of a witness named Jane, who confirms the authenticity of exhibits including her signature, photographs taken before she was 14, and a letter of recommendation. The transcript also captures a procedural exchange between the judge and an attorney, Ms. Menninger, regarding a binder of government exhibits.
DOJ-OGR-00016376.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness, A. Farmer. The questioning focuses on a substantial claim submitted by the witness's attorneys to the Epstein Victims Compensation Program on June 26, 2020. This submission occurred approximately one month after the witness had spoken with the government.
DOJ-OGR-00016120.jpg
This document is page 10 of a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, for Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The text details a discussion between attorneys (Ms. Moe and Ms. Sternheim) and the Judge regarding the logistics of projecting evidence on screens for a witness. The primary concerns raised are ensuring the government can follow the proceedings and preventing the public gallery from viewing the screens to maintain privacy.
DOJ-OGR-00016829.jpg
This document is page 100 of a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca is conducting a direct examination of Dr. Eva Dubin. Dr. Dubin testifies that she did not observe inappropriate conduct between Jeffrey Epstein and teenage females during the period roughly between 1994 and 2004, after she stopped dating him. The court then proceeds to discuss the presentation of sealed Government Exhibit 241 (photos) to the witness.
DOJ-OGR-00016396.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case dated August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer by attorney Ms. Menninger. The questioning focuses on the witness's profession as a psychologist and her work with victims of sexual trauma. An opposing attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, objects to a question, which is then withdrawn.
DOJ-OGR-00013771.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness, A. Farmer, by an attorney, Ms. Menninger. The questioning establishes that the witness is a psychologist who works with victims of sexual trauma and has mentioned this in public appearances. An objection to a question about credibility is made by another attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, and is subsequently withdrawn.
DOJ-OGR-00013751.jpg
This document is a page from the cross-examination transcript of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer) in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The questioning focuses on Farmer confirming she spoke to the government in roughly May 2020 and subsequently submitted a 3,000-page claim to the Epstein Victims Compensation Program on June 26, 2020. Defense attorney Ms. Menninger then introduces exhibit AF-13 for the witness to review.
DOJ-OGR-00011675.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a procedural discussion between the prosecution (Ms. Moe), the Defense (Ms. Sternheim), and the Judge regarding the placement of screens in the courtroom to ensure evidence shown to a witness is not visible to the public in the gallery. The prosecution expresses concern about visibility for their paralegal and the public, which the Defense addresses by clarifying seating arrangements.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity