DOJ-OGR-00000076.tif
42.6 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
5
Events
2
Relationships
7
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document / court opinion
File Size:
42.6 KB
Summary
This legal document discusses the denial of Maxwell's motions to dismiss charges related to the sexual abuse of minors, focusing on the application of § 3283. It references the Weingarten v. United States case, which established a 'case-specific approach' for interpreting statutory provisions, and notes that one of the victims is identified as 'Jane'. The document cites several legal precedents, including United States v. Sampson, Weingarten v. United States, United States v. Maxwell, and Taylor v. United States.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Maxwell | Defendant |
Motions to dismiss charges denied by District Court. Involved in United States v. Maxwell case.
|
| Jane | Victim/Witness |
One of the women involved in the case related to sexual abuse of a minor.
|
| Taylor | Party in a cited case |
Party in Taylor v. United States, relevant to the 'categorical approach'.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| District Court |
Denied Maxwell's motions to dismiss, applied Weingarten v. United States, reviewed de novo.
|
|
| Congress |
Intended courts to apply § 3283 using a case-specific approach; legislative history suggests broad application.
|
|
| United States |
Party in several cited cases (United States v. Sampson, Weingarten v. United States, United States v. Maxwell, Taylor...
|
Timeline (5 events)
Relationships (2)
District Court correctly denied Maxwell's motions to dismiss
Jane, one of the women who [involved in the sexual abuse of minor case]
Key Quotes (7)
""We review de novo the denial of a motion to dismiss an indictment and the application of a statute of limitations.""Source
DOJ-OGR-00000076.tif
Quote #1
""Counts Three and Four of the Indictment are offenses involving the sexual abuse of minors.""Source
DOJ-OGR-00000076.tif
Quote #2
""In Weingarten, we explained that Congress intended courts to apply § 3283 using a case-specific approach as opposed to a "categorical approach."""Source
DOJ-OGR-00000076.tif
Quote #3
""The "categorical approach" is a method of statutory interpretation that requires courts to look "only to the statutory definitions of the prior offenses, and not to the particular facts underlying those convictions" for sentencing and immigration purposes.""Source
DOJ-OGR-00000076.tif
Quote #4
""[t]he language of § 3283[]... reaches beyond the offense and its legal elements to the conduct 'involv[ed]' in the offense.""Source
DOJ-OGR-00000076.tif
Quote #5
""legislative history suggests that Congress intended § 3283 to be applied broadly.""Source
DOJ-OGR-00000076.tif
Quote #6
""a case-specific approach would not produce practical difficulties or potential unfairness.""Source
DOJ-OGR-00000076.tif
Quote #7
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document