Taylor
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
U.S.
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
Illinois
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Nicholas [Redacted]
|
Source investigator to official |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Rusty Shackleford
|
Investigator to source material |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-01 | Court case | U.S. v. Taylor, 142 S. Ct. 2015 (2022) | U.S. Supreme Court | View |
| 2012-07-02 | Legal ruling | The case Fierro v. Taylor was decided in the Southern District of New York. | SDNY | View |
| 2012-07-02 | Court ruling | A ruling in the case Fierro v. Taylor was made by the SDNY court. | SDNY | View |
| 1990-01-01 | N/A | Taylor v. United States case, 495 U.S. 575, 600 | N/A | View |
| 1990-01-01 | Legal case | The case of *Taylor v. United States*, 495 U.S. 575, 602 (1990) is cited as an example of courts ... | N/A | View |
| 1988-01-01 | Court decision | The Supreme Court issued a decision in the case of Taylor v. Illinois, which involved the exclusi... | Illinois | View |
| 1988-01-01 | Court case | Citation to Taylor v. Illinois, 484 U.S. 400 (1988). | N/A | View |
| 1975-01-01 | Legal decision | The case of Taylor v. Louisiana was decided. | Louisiana | View |
| 0006-09-01 | N/A | Flight from PBI to TEB | PBI to TEB | View |
LETTER.pdf
This document is a legal filing dated December 10, 2015, in which Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, Paul Morris, files a 'Notice to Invoke Discretionary Jurisdiction' with the Supreme Court of Florida. Epstein is appealing a decision made on November 12, 2015, by the District Court of Appeal (Fourth District) in the case of 'Bradley J. Edwards v. Jeffrey Epstein'. The attached opinion reveals that the lower court reversed a summary judgment that had favored Epstein, ruling that 'litigation privilege' does not bar Edwards' claim of malicious prosecution against Epstein.
EFTA00027576.pdf
This document contains an email chain discussing the finalization and logistics of a Focus Group Questionnaire for an upcoming Saturday event. Participants coordinate on printing 40 copies of jury instructions, handling verdict forms, and whether document binders will be provided for jurors.
EFTA00022633.pdf
This document is an email chain from August 2019 between USANYS officials and John Taylor, host of the 'Traffick Report Show'. Taylor provides evidence to the SDNY regarding an ambulance marked 'LSJ AMBULANCE' found on Little Saint James, alleging it was unregistered, lacked medical certification, and may have been smuggled into the USVI. Taylor also references drone footage from 'Rusty Shackleford' showing activity on the island prior to the SDNY raid and questions whether evidence was destroyed.
EFTA00004057.pdf
This document consists of scanned evidence pages labeled EFTA00004057 through EFTA00004059. The first page is an advertisement for Scarlett's Cabaret located in Hallandale Beach, FL. The second page is the cover of an adult magazine titled 'XCITEMENT' featuring Taylor Wane, priced at $4.95. The third page contains a handwritten file number '1B6-12a'.
DOJ-OGR-00000076.tif
This legal document discusses the denial of Maxwell's motions to dismiss charges related to the sexual abuse of minors, focusing on the application of § 3283. It references the Weingarten v. United States case, which established a 'case-specific approach' for interpreting statutory provisions, and notes that one of the victims is identified as 'Jane'. The document cites several legal precedents, including United States v. Sampson, Weingarten v. United States, United States v. Maxwell, and Taylor v. United States.
DOJ-OGR-00022257.tif
This document is a flight log from July 2001, detailing multiple flights with various aircraft and pilots, including David Rodger. It records departure and arrival locations, aircraft tail numbers, and remarks often listing passengers or crew members like Shelley Lewes, Virginia Roberts, and Mere Donovan, as well as pilot training events for Jonathan Mano. Financial information regarding 'Amount Forward' and 'Total to Date' is also included.
DOJ-OGR-00018077.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Alessi, likely Juan Alessi. The testimony details the procedure for handling incoming phone calls for Mr. Epstein; specifically, if Epstein was unavailable, Alessi, his wife, or a staff member named Taylor would record the caller's name and number in a message book. Alessi confirms that these message books, both new and old, were stored in a utility closet within his office located off the staff room. The page concludes with prosecutor Ms. Comey introducing Government Exhibit 2.
DOJ-OGR-00000446.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal filing dated July 16, 2019, addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman. The filing argues against granting release to a defendant named Epstein, asserting that his immense wealth and financial sophistication create an irrebuttable presumption that he is a flight risk. The document quotes previous court transcripts and letters to argue that Epstein could easily transfer assets abroad, become a fugitive, and continue to earn millions, making any conditions of release, including a bond, meaningless.
DOJ-OGR-00000432.jpg
This legal document, part of a filing to Judge Richard M. Berman, argues against the government's position that Jeffrey Epstein's wealth creates an 'irrebuttable presumption' that he is a flight risk and should be denied release. The filing contends that this amounts to a 'per se rule' that is contrary to law. It cites government arguments from other court records which detail Epstein's financial sophistication, international ties, and ability to transfer assets and earn millions abroad as reasons why no bail conditions could be effective.
DOJ-OGR-00021106.jpg
This legal document, part of Case 22-1426, argues against a court's decision to use a 'case-specific' approach instead of the standard 'categorical approach' for a case involving the transportation of minors. The author contends that under the correct categorical approach, which looks only at the elements of the statute, Counts Three and Four should have been dismissed because sexual abuse is not a required element of the crime. The document criticizes the court for rejecting this established legal principle to avoid dismissing the charges.
DOJ-OGR-00021058.jpg
This document is page 11 of a legal filing from Case 22-1426, dated February 28, 2023. It is a table of authorities listing numerous U.S. court cases, dating from 1926 to 2022, which are cited within the main document. Each citation includes the case name, legal reporter information, and the page numbers where the case is referenced.
DOJ-OGR-00020769.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing in a criminal case against an individual named Maxwell. The court analyzes and ultimately rejects Maxwell's argument that a 'categorical approach' should be used to interpret the statutes related to the charges. The court relies on precedent from the Second and Third Circuits, particularly the reasoning in *Weingarten v. United States*, to conclude that the categorical approach is not applicable in this context.
DOJ-OGR-00016000.jpg
This document is a flight log page (No. 85) signed by pilot David Rodgers, covering flights from July 16, 2001, to August 16, 2001. It records travel on aircraft N909JE, N908JE, and N908GM between locations including Santa Fe (SAF), Teterboro (TEB), Palm Beach (PBI), St. Thomas (TIST), and Albuquerque (ABQ). Notable passengers include Jeffrey Epstein (JE), Ghislaine Maxwell (GM), and Virginia Roberts (VR), with specific entries placing Epstein and Roberts together on flights on July 16 and July 28, 2001.
DOJ-OGR-00002327.jpg
This legal document is an argument on behalf of defendant Ms. Maxwell, challenging the composition of the grand jury that indicted her. It cites an analysis by jury expert Jeffrey Martin from a similar case, United States v. Balde, which found significant underrepresentation of Black and Hispanic persons in the White Plains jury wheel. The argument posits that since Ms. Maxwell's grand jury was drawn from the same system, her Sixth Amendment right to a grand jury selected from a fair cross-section of the community was violated.
DOJ-OGR-00002327(1).jpg
This legal document argues that the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, was denied her Sixth Amendment right to a grand jury selected from a fair cross-section of the community. It cites a parallel case, U.S. v. Balde, and an expert analysis by Jeffrey Martin, which found significant underrepresentation of Black and Hispanic individuals in the White Plains jury wheel. Because Ms. Maxwell's grand jury was drawn from the same pool, the document contends this analysis applies to her case as well.
DOJ-OGR-00002323.jpg
This document is page 3 (Table of Authorities) of a legal filing (Document 126) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on January 25, 2021. It lists legal precedents (cases) and statutes cited in the brief, including Supreme Court cases like Duren v. Missouri and Second Circuit cases like United States v. Jackman. The document bears a Department of Justice Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00002323.
DOJ-OGR-00002323(1).jpg
This document is page 'ii' (labeled Page 3 of 13 in the PDF) of a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It is a 'Table of Authorities' listing various legal precedents (Cases) and Statutes cited elsewhere in the filing. The citations heavily reference cases involving jury selection and fair representation (e.g., Duren v. Missouri, Taylor v. Louisiana), suggesting the main document likely involves a motion regarding jury composition or selection.
DOJ-OGR-00030576.jpg
This document is Page 29 (transcript page 109 of 131) of a concordance or word index for a legal deposition or court transcript, produced by J. Consor & Associates on July 26, 2017. It lists keywords alphabetically from 'N' to 'T' alongside their page and line numbers in the main transcript. Significant keywords include 'Recarey' (likely Detective Nick Recarey), 'Shelling' (likely an attorney), 'Palm' (Palm Beach), 'police', 'photographs', 'sex', 'naked', 'massage' terms (oil/oils), and 'polycythemia' (a specific medical condition).
DOJ-OGR-00021892.jpg
This legal document, part of an appellate court opinion, addresses arguments made by a defendant named Maxwell. The court rejects a 'categorical approach' for determining if offenses involved sexual abuse, citing testimony from a victim, 'Jane', about being abused as a minor across state lines. The document then introduces Maxwell's second argument: that certain counts are barred by the statute of limitations because a 2003 amendment to § 3283 should not apply retroactively, referencing the Supreme Court case Landgraf v. USI Film Products.
DOJ-OGR-00021809.jpg
This legal document, part of Case 22-1426, discusses two key arguments. First, it affirms that charges involving the sexual abuse of a minor ("Jane") transported across state lines fall under § 3283. Second, it addresses an argument by Maxwell that certain counts are time-barred because a 2003 amendment to the statute of limitations in § 3283 should not apply retroactively, referencing the Supreme Court's test in 'Landgraf v. USI Film Products'.
DOJ-OGR-00031699.jpg
This is an internal Limited Brands incident report regarding a Victoria's Secret employee who was investigated and terminated for theft. The report details a history of suspicious behavior involving returned shoes and a specific incident on October 28, 2005, where the employee was caught with concealed merchandise. On November 4, 2005, RLPM Colon interviewed the employee, who admitted to stealing $209.00 worth of goods due to financial struggles and agreed to pay restitution.
DOJ-OGR-00031480.jpg
This is an incident report from Victoria's Secret detailing an employee theft investigation in late 2005. An employee was first observed with stolen merchandise on October 28, 2005. Following a tip from another associate, Regional Loss Prevention Manager Colon interviewed the subject on November 4, 2005, at which point she admitted to stealing $209 worth of items due to financial struggles, agreed to pay restitution, and was allowed to resign.
DOJ-OGR-00031451.jpg
This document is a Limited Brands/Victoria's Secret incident report (VSS2005015662) faxed in 2006 regarding events in late 2005. It details an internal investigation into an employee (name redacted) who was involved in a suspicious customer dispute involving shoes and later caught stealing merchandise, including panties and perfume. The employee confessed to Loss Prevention Manager Colon on November 4, 2005, citing financial struggles, agreed to pay $209.00 in restitution, and was allowed to resign.
DOJ-OGR-00004880.jpg
This legal document argues that Bill Cosby did not invoke his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination during civil depositions because he reasonably relied on District Attorney Castor's decision not to prosecute him. This reliance led Cosby to provide incriminating testimony about his past drug use, which hindered his defense in the civil action brought by Constand and resulted in a significant financial settlement. The central legal question raised is whether Cosby's reliance on the prosecutor's assurance was reasonable.
DOJ-OGR-00004878.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on July 2, 2021. The text appears to be an excerpt from a Pennsylvania Supreme Court opinion (*Commonwealth v. Taylor*) discussing the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination, citing various U.S. Supreme Court precedents to argue that the privilege applies broadly in both criminal and civil/administrative proceedings. The document emphasizes that the right accompanies a person regardless of the legal proceeding type.
Re: SDNY raid on Little Saint James
Detailed report on the illegality of the LSJ Ambulance (lack of registration/certification), potential smuggling, and questions about the raid.
Re: SDNY raid on Little Saint James
Declining to comment but inviting Taylor to forward information.
SDNY raid on Little Saint James
Requesting press release on LSJ raid and offering info on the ambulance.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity