DOJ-OGR-00003090.jpg

352 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

2
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court filing / legal brief (criminal case)
File Size: 352 KB
Summary

This document is page 156 of a court filing (Document 204) in Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on April 16, 2021. The text argues that a jury should decide if the defendant lied, rejecting the defendant's claims that her answers were truthful. It introduces 'Count Six,' which charges the defendant with perjury related to a 'second deposition' that occurred in July 2016, though the specific transcripts of that deposition are redacted on this page.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Defendant Accused
Subject of the perjury charges (Count Six) and the legal argument regarding intent and truthfulness. (Contextually Gh...
Jury Trier of Fact
Reference to the future role of the jury in deciding if the defendant lied.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Department of Justice (DOJ)
Indicated by the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00003090.
US District Court
Implied by the case filing header.

Timeline (2 events)

2016-07
Second Deposition
Unknown
2021-04-16
Document Filing
Court

Relationships (1)

Defendant Adversarial Prosecution/Government
The text argues that the defendant's defenses should be rejected and that she lied.

Key Quotes (3)

"A properly instructed jury could conclude after hearing all of the evidence at trial that the defendant intended the natural meaning of the words she used, not the allegedly truthful answer she suggests now, and therefore that she lied."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00003090.jpg
Quote #1
"In sum, the defendant’s post-hoc efforts to inject confusion into clear questioning are unavailing and should be rejected, and the jury should decide whether the defendant’s answers were false."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00003090.jpg
Quote #2
"Count Six charges the defendant with perjury arising from three colloquies at the second deposition."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00003090.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document