DOJ-OGR-00018057.jpg

565 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

4
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 565 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed August 10, 2022) during the direct examination of a witness named Alessi. A procedural discussion occurs between the Judge (The Court), Defense Attorney Mr. Pagliuca, and Prosecutor Ms. Comey regarding an objection to the foundation of the witness's knowledge about a specific 'book' created after the witness left employment in 2002. The Court decides to allow the question provisionally, noting the testimony will be stricken if proper foundation is not established.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Alessi Witness
Name appears in header 'Alessi - Direct', presumably the witness whose testimony is being discussed (likely Juan Ales...
The Court Judge
Presiding over the procedural discussion regarding objections and evidence foundation.
Mr. Pagliuca Defense Attorney
Raises an objection regarding the witness's foundation of knowledge concerning a 'book' dated after the witness left ...
Ms. Comey Prosecutor
Responding to the Court regarding witness authentication.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Listed in footer.
DOJ
Department of Justice, implied by Bates stamp 'DOJ-OGR-00018057'.
Southern District of New York
Implied by the Case number format and reporter name.

Timeline (2 events)

2002
Date referenced by Mr. Pagliuca as the year the witness left employment.
Unknown
2022-08-10
Court proceedings in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (US v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Discussion regarding witness foundation and authentication of a book.
Southern District Court

Relationships (2)

Alessi Adversarial Mr. Pagliuca
Pagliuca is challenging Alessi's ability to authenticate a document.
Ms. Comey Opposing Counsel Mr. Pagliuca
Argue different sides of the objection in court.

Key Quotes (3)

"MR. PAGLIUCA: Well, I guess if he left in 2002 and the book is after 2002, I don't think there can be a basis for knowledge."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00018057.jpg
Quote #1
"THE COURT: Well, I'll allow the question to be asked. And if there's not, then I will agree with you and I'll strike the testimony."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00018057.jpg
Quote #2
"MS. COMEY: Yes, your Honor. That other witness we believe could also authenticate it, but --"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00018057.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document