DOJ-OGR-00021692.jpg
633 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing / appellate brief (page 32 of brief, page 45 of pdf)
File Size:
633 KB
Summary
This page is from a 2023 legal filing (likely the government's response to Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal) arguing against claims of retroactive application of the statute of limitations. It asserts that because the criminal conduct (conspiracy and sex trafficking involving Victim-4) continued through 2004, it post-dated the 2003 amendment to Section 3283.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant/Appellant |
Mentioned in footnote 7 regarding her legal argument challenging sufficiency of evidence.
|
| Victim-4 | Victim |
Mentioned in relation to conduct continuing through 2004 described in the indictment.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit |
Cited in case law (2d Cir.)
|
|
| Department of Justice (DOJ) |
Indicated by footer stamp 'DOJ-OGR'
|
Timeline (2 events)
2004
End date of alleged continued conduct for Counts Three and Six involving Victim-4
Unspecified
Relationships (1)
Text references indictment describing conduct through 2004 involving Victim-4.
Key Quotes (3)
"Counts Three and Six both charged conduct that continued through 2004, i.e., after the 2003 amendment to Section 3283"Source
DOJ-OGR-00021692.jpg
Quote #1
"“[t]he statute of limitations runs from the date of the last overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy.”"Source
DOJ-OGR-00021692.jpg
Quote #2
"“the conduct has run its course.”"Source
DOJ-OGR-00021692.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document