DOJ-OGR-00021560.jpg
562 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
562 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 22-1426) dated June 29, 2023, in which a judge is ruling on defense objections to specific paragraphs (79 and 81) of a report. The judge discusses Virginia's testimony regarding interactions at Epstein's properties, specifically noting that trial evidence disproved claims that Virginia was unaware of other victims. The judge overrules an objection regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's responsibility for sexualized massages performed by individuals brought by a woman named Carolyn, concluding that Maxwell's recruitment of Virginia set the broader scheme in motion.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Virginia | Victim/Witness |
Subject of testimony regarding interactions at Epstein's properties; recruitment set the scheme in motion.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Perpetrator |
Owner of properties; recipient of massages; engaged in sexual activity.
|
| Annie Farmer | Victim/Witness |
Mentioned in context that Virginia never gave her a massage.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Referred to as 'the defendant' and 'Ms. Maxwell'; raising objections to the report; responsible for recruitment scheme.
|
| Carolyn | Associate/Recruiter |
Brought women or other people to Epstein's residence.
|
| The Judge | Presiding Official |
Speaker overruling objections (implied by 'I am prepared to overrule', 'I do conclude').
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Footer information.
|
|
| Department of Justice (DOJ) |
Implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00021560.
|
Timeline (3 events)
06/29/2023
Court ruling on objections to a report (likely Presentence Investigation Report).
Court
Judge
Ghislaine Maxwell
1990s and 2000s
Unknown (Trial)
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Where interactions took place.
|
|
|
Where Carolyn brought women.
|
Relationships (3)
the defendant's recruitment of Virginia set the recruitment scheme in motion
Carolyn may have brought to Epstein's residence
She never gave Annie Farmer a massage.
Key Quotes (3)
"The credible testimony and evidence admitted at trial disproves these assertions which were made under oath."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021560.jpg
Quote #1
"I do conclude that the evidence at trial established that the defendant's recruitment of Virginia set the recruitment scheme in motion that resulted"Source
DOJ-OGR-00021560.jpg
Quote #2
"Ms. Maxwell had direct responsibility for any sexualized massages that several women or any other people that Carolyn may have brought to Epstein's residence may have performed"Source
DOJ-OGR-00021560.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document