EFTA00022199.pdf
103 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
6
Organizations
3
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email / legal correspondence
File Size:
103 KB
Summary
An email from Daniel Cundy (Blackfords LLP) dated August 9, 2020, providing legal reference materials following a phone call. The email attaches extracts regarding Financial Conduct Authority procedures and criminal law fraud procedures. The text discusses legal protections regarding compulsory powers in MLAT (Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty) requests, citing *United States v. Allen* and *Kastigar v. United States* (protection against self-incrimination).
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Daniel Cundy | Sender / Partner |
Partner at Blackfords LLP, sending legal reference materials regarding MLAT requests and self-incrimination protections.
|
| Gary Bloxsome | CC Recipient |
Copied on the email, presumably a colleague at Blackfords LLP.
|
| Jennifer Richardson | CC Recipient |
Copied on the email, presumably a colleague or associated counsel.
|
Organizations (6)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Blackfords LLP |
Law firm representing the sender.
|
|
| Financial Conduct Authority |
Source of the handbook extract (DEPP 7) attached to the email.
|
|
| Serious Fraud Office |
Mentioned in the context of compulsory powers and fraud procedure.
|
|
| Solicitors Regulation Authority |
Regulatory body mentioned in the footer.
|
|
| Chambers UK |
Awarding body in signature.
|
|
| Legal 500 |
Awarding body in signature.
|
Timeline (1 events)
Locations (3)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of Blackfords LLP office.
|
|
|
Registered office location for Blackfords LLP.
|
|
|
Mentioned in case citations (United States v. Allen, Kastigar v. United States).
|
Relationships (2)
Both included on email from Blackfords LLP.
Included on email thread.
Key Quotes (3)
"This practice and approach resonates with the law as set out in United States v. Allen, 864 F.3d (2d Cir.2017)."Source
EFTA00022199.pdf
Quote #1
"We reiterate the protection at Article 7 (2) of the MLAT treaty although there is no need to attach it."Source
EFTA00022199.pdf
Quote #2
"limitations and protections on use when their compulsory powers are used in MLAT requests, an approach which reflects such cases as Kastigar v. United States"Source
EFTA00022199.pdf
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document