Chambers
OrganizationRelationship Network
EFTA00030995.pdf
This document is an email chain from August 20-22, 2020, involving defense attorney Bruce Barket and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The subject concerns a letter regarding 'jail conditions and court appearance,' specifically citing 'COVID stuff at MCC' (Metropolitan Correctional Center). The USANYS staff discusses coordinating a response to Judge Karas by the following Monday.
EFTA00030698.pdf
This document is an email chain from January 2020 between Gary Bloxsome (Blackfords LLP) and prosecutors from the U.S. Department of Justice, Southern District of New York (SDNY). The SDNY formally requests a 'consensual, voluntary law enforcement interview' with Bloxsome's client, HRH The Duke of York (Prince Andrew), regarding the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and his associates. Bloxsome confirms he represents the Duke and arranges a preliminary telephone call for January 10, 2020.
EFTA00030692.pdf
This document is a chain of emails between the U.S. Department of Justice (SDNY) and Gary Bloxsome of Blackfords LLP in early January 2020. The DOJ formally requests a voluntary law enforcement interview with Bloxsome's client, HRH The Duke of York (Prince Andrew), regarding his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. The correspondence confirms Blackfords' representation of the Duke and arranges a preliminary telephone discussion for January 10, 2020.
EFTA00030238.pdf
This document is an email thread from July 8-9, 2019, between defense attorney Marc Fernich and an Assistant U.S. Attorney regarding the case U.S. v. Epstein. The correspondence covers the filing of the government's bail memorandum to Judge Pitman and Judge Berman. Additionally, Fernich requests the return of Jeffrey Epstein's personal effects (phone and cash) seized upon arrest, leading to coordination with a Special Agent.
EFTA00029606.pdf
This document is a 'White Collar Law360' email newsletter dated July 14, 2021, summarizing various legal news stories, court rulings, and job moves. It mentions Jeffrey Epstein in a brief 'People' section note about Cooley LLP hiring a former New York federal prosecutor who previously led prosecutions against Epstein and Michael Cohen. The newsletter also covers the conviction of Paul Manafort's banker, Stephen Calk, and allegations against the Serious Fraud Office (SFO).
EFTA00029465.pdf
An email dated February 5, 2019, from the Government to the Chambers of Judge Netburn regarding the case 'Jane Doe 43 v. Epstein, et al.' The email submits an attached application and proposed order, respectfully requesting that these documents be filed under seal.
EFTA00029464.pdf
This document is an email dated February 5, 2019, sent by a Government representative to the Chambers of Judge Sweet regarding the case 'v. Maxwell, et al., 15 Civ. 7433 (RWS)'. The email transmits an attachment related to an unsealing application and order, which the Government requests be filed under seal. The sender and recipient email addresses are redacted.
EFTA00028417.pdf
An email dated July 11, 2019, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York to the Chambers of Judge Berman. The email serves as a courtesy copy of the Government's response to a sealing motion in the case U.S. v. Epstein (19 Cr. 490). Defense counsel, including an address for Reid Weingarten at Steptoe, is copied on the correspondence.
EFTA00027653.pdf
An email from the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan to defense counsel Jeff Pagliuca and Laura Menninger regarding the case US v. Maxwell (20cr330). The email notes that a court-ordered response due by 12:00 p.m. that day had not yet been received.
EFTA00027648.pdf
An email chain from November 9, 2021, regarding the case US v. Maxwell (20cr330). Judge Alison J. Nathan's chambers emailed counsel noting a missing response to a court order (Dkt. 421) that was due at noon. Defense attorney Christian Everdell forwarded this to others (likely including the prosecution), clarifying that the defense understood the government was responsible for handling victim notifications and reporting to the Court.
EFTA00026542.pdf
This document contains an email exchange from January 2020 between Gary Bloxsome of Blackfords LLP and federal prosecutors from the Southern District of New York. The prosecutors, investigating conduct related to Jeffrey Epstein, inquired if Blackfords represented HRH The Duke of York (Prince Andrew). Gary Bloxsome confirmed the representation and asked for clarification regarding the specific reason for the contact.
EFTA00024021.pdf
This document is an email chain from March 2021 related to the U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell case. Christian Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP submits reply memoranda and exhibits for pretrial motions to Judge Nathan's chambers and government prosecutors (USANYS), noting that documents are being filed under seal with redacted versions for the public docket.
EFTA00023817.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 28 to August 3, 2020, between SDNY prosecutors (including an AUSA and Alison) and UK defense attorneys from Blackfords LLP (Gary Bloxsome, Jennifer Richardson). The correspondence negotiates the terms of a voluntary interview for a Blackfords client (unnamed in text, but contextually relevant to Prince Andrew) in connection with 'US v Maxwell'. Key topics include protections against evidence use outside the Maxwell case, immunity comparable to MLAT proceedings, elements of 18 U.S.C. 1001 (False Statements), and the extension of a 'Negotiation Period' to August 10, 2020.
EFTA00023804.pdf
This document is a chain of email correspondence between the U.S. Department of Justice (SDNY) and Gary Bloxsome, the lawyer representing Prince Andrew, spanning January to February 2020. The DOJ explicitly requests a voluntary interview with Prince Andrew regarding his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. While Bloxsome claims the Prince desires to cooperate, tensions escalate when U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman publicly states that Prince Andrew has provided 'zero cooperation,' leading Bloxsome to accuse the DOJ of breaching confidentiality agreements.
EFTA00023791.pdf
This document contains a chain of emails between Gary Bloxsome (representing Prince Andrew, the Duke of York) and an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York (SDNY) in July 2020. The correspondence details tense negotiations regarding a request for Prince Andrew to sit for a voluntary interview concerning the Epstein investigation. Key points of contention include the confidentiality of the proceedings, allegations of media leaks by US officials (specifically Geoffrey Berman and Audrey Strauss), and the legal mechanisms of the interview (voluntary vs. compelled via MLAT). The SDNY proposes a two-week confidential negotiation period to resolve the impasse.
EFTA00023783.pdf
This document is a chain of emails between Gary Bloxsome (counsel for Prince Andrew/Duke of York) and an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York in July 2020. The correspondence concerns negotiations for Prince Andrew to provide a voluntary interview to US authorities regarding the Epstein investigation. The US side threatens a compelled interview via MLAT if no voluntary date is set, while the UK side complains about leaks, 'media circus', and seeks strict confidentiality assurances before agreeing to an interview.
EFTA00023680.pdf
This document is an email chain from August 20-21, 2020, involving attorney Bruce Barket of Barket Epstein Kearon Aldea & LoTurco, LLP and the US Attorney's Office (Narcotics Unit). The subject concerns a 'Letter regarding jail conditions and court appearance' and a 'Continued Inhumane Prison' attachment sent to Judge Karas. The USANYS Co-Chief of the Narcotics Unit requests an urgent call to discuss the matter, citing a Monday deadline.
EFTA00023460.pdf
This document is an email from the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan dated October 29, 2021, regarding the case US v. Maxwell (20cr330). It is addressed to counsel, including Laura Menninger and Jeff Pagliuca, distributing an attached Order issued by the Judge and noting it will be filed publicly the following Monday.
EFTA00022327.pdf
An email from the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan (NYSD) dated November 3, 2021, addressed to Counsel regarding the case 'US v. Maxwell' (20cr330). The email serves to transmit two attached orders issued by Judge Nathan that were scheduled to be docketed the following morning.
EFTA00022201.pdf
This document is an email thread between an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York and Gary Bloxsome, a partner at Blackfords LLP in London, dating from July 28 to August 10, 2020. The correspondence details negotiations for a 'voluntary interview' (proffer) of Bloxsome's unnamed client regarding the client's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, specifically focusing on communications and knowledge of sexual activity with women or girls. Key points of negotiation include the scope of immunity (SDNY offering limited use immunity versus the broader protections of an MLAT compelled interview) and the specific legal ramifications of providing false statements under 18 U.S.C. Section 1001.
EFTA00022199.pdf
An email from Daniel Cundy (Blackfords LLP) dated August 9, 2020, providing legal reference materials following a phone call. The email attaches extracts regarding Financial Conduct Authority procedures and criminal law fraud procedures. The text discusses legal protections regarding compulsory powers in MLAT (Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty) requests, citing *United States v. Allen* and *Kastigar v. United States* (protection against self-incrimination).
EFTA00021414.pdf
An email chain from July 16, 2019, between members of the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) discussing a draft detention submission for Jeffrey Epstein (referred to as JE in the attachment). The earliest email reveals that an Assistant United States Attorney spoke with Judge Berman's chambers, and the clerk conveyed that the Judge refused to see certain photographs without explanation, leading the prosecution to decide not to bring them.
EFTA00021402.pdf
This document is an email chain between Jeffrey Epstein's defense attorneys (Martin Weinberg and Marc Fernich) and the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) shortly after Epstein's July 2019 arrest. The defense requests the return of items seized from Epstein's person upon arrest, specifically cash and his cellphone. The government agrees to return the cash and personal effects at an upcoming Thursday hearing but refuses to return the electronic devices, stating they have obtained a warrant to search them and will retain them as evidence. Weinberg also mentions providing a list of attorneys for a 'taint prosecutor,' implying a privilege review process.
EFTA00019111.pdf
An email chain from June 2020 involving attorney Bruce Barket acknowledging receipt of a sealed ex parte order from Judge Karas regarding case 16cr832. The correspondence involves defense counsel, firewall counsel, and representatives from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS).
EFTA00018219.pdf
This document is an email thread between USANYS staff members dated February 3, 2020, and January 31, 2020. It concerns the logistical pickup of a signed 'Epstein 6(e) Order' from Judge Nathan's chambers following a notification from the Judge's clerk. The emails discuss coordinating a paralegal to retrieve the document.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity