DOJ-OGR-00001972.jpg
629 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal correspondence / cover letter
File Size:
629 KB
Summary
This document is a legal cover letter dated December 8, 2020, from attorneys Mark Cohen and Christian Everdell to Judge Alison Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The attorneys are submitting a Renewed Motion for Bail under seal, providing both an unredacted version for the court and a redacted version for public filing to protect privacy and confidential financial information. The document references previous correspondence and protective orders governing discovery materials.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant / Client |
Subject of the renewed motion for bail.
|
| Alison J. Nathan | Judge |
Recipient of the letter; presiding judge in United States District Court SDNY.
|
| Mark S. Cohen | Attorney |
Defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell; partner at Cohen & Gresser LLP.
|
| Christian R. Everdell | Attorney |
Defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell; signer of the letter.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Cohen & Gresser LLP |
Defense counsel firm representing Ghislaine Maxwell.
|
|
| United States District Court Southern District of New York |
Venue for the case.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR).
|
Timeline (1 events)
2020-12-08
Submission of Ghislaine Maxwell's Renewed Motion for Bail
Southern District of New York
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Address of the United States District Court SDNY.
|
|
|
Address of Cohen & Gresser LLP.
|
Relationships (2)
Letter states 'On behalf of our client, Ghislaine Maxwell'
Letter states 'On behalf of our client, Ghislaine Maxwell'
Key Quotes (2)
"we respectfully submit under seal two versions of the Memorandum of Ghislaine Maxwell in Support of Her Renewed Motion for Bail"Source
DOJ-OGR-00001972.jpg
Quote #1
"The proposed redactions are based on the following: (1) privacy concerns... and (2) the Motion’s reference to, and discussion of, Confidential Information, including financial documents"Source
DOJ-OGR-00001972.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document