DOJ-OGR-00018942.jpg
632 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
632 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features an argument by attorney Mr. Pagliuca regarding the admissibility of evidence under the business records exception (Rule 803.6), specifically challenging the consistency of record-keeping in a 'book' and 'Western Union money transfer records' after an individual named Mr. Alessi left in 2002. The defense argues that the records do not meet the standard of a regular business practice.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Attorney |
Speaking to the court, arguing against the admissibility/regularity of certain records.
|
| Ms. Hesse | Witness |
Mentioned in header ('Hesse - direct') and by Pagliuca regarding her testimony on record-keeping practices.
|
| Mr. Alessi | Former Employee/Witness |
Mentioned as having left in 2002; his adherence to record-keeping practices is being compared to the records in quest...
|
| The Court | Judge |
Interjects to clarify a point about record keeping ('Not followed in every instance').
|
| Lieberman | Legal Reference |
Referenced in the context of a 'Lieberman-related issue' regarding the content of messages.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Western Union |
Mentioned in relation to money transfer records being discussed as evidence.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Transcription service listed in footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (referenced in footer stamp DOJ-OGR).
|
Timeline (2 events)
2022-08-10
Court proceedings regarding Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell).
Southern District of New York (implied by reporter)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Vague reference by Mr. Pagliuca (Line 11), likely referring to one of the properties involved in the case.
|
Relationships (1)
Both mentioned as individuals who testified or established record-keeping practices for the same entity.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document