Ms. Hesse
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Epstein/Maxwell
|
Employee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The Household
|
Employee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Alessi
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Employee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Alessi
|
Employee |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-10 | Court hearing | Cross-examination of witness Ms. Hesse by Mr. Pagliuca regarding her knowledge of Epstein and Max... | Courtroom | View |
| 0022-08-10 | N/A | Court Cross-Examination | Southern District Court (im... | View |
DOJ-OGR-00018957.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (cross-examination) filed on August 10, 2022. Attorney Mr. Pagliuca questions witness Ms. Hesse about her knowledge of women visiting Jeffrey Epstein for massages when Ghislaine Maxwell was not present, which Hesse confirms based on messages she took. The testimony also establishes that Hesse knew Maxwell had a home in New York but was unaware of a residence in Miami.
DOJ-OGR-00018942.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features an argument by attorney Mr. Pagliuca regarding the admissibility of evidence under the business records exception (Rule 803.6), specifically challenging the consistency of record-keeping in a 'book' and 'Western Union money transfer records' after an individual named Mr. Alessi left in 2002. The defense argues that the records do not meet the standard of a regular business practice.
DOJ-OGR-00018938.jpg
This document is page 76 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (US v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a legal argument between Ms. Moe (Prosecution) and Mr. Pagliuca (Defense) regarding the evidentiary weight and authenticity of message books/logs. Ms. Moe argues the logs are sequential and chronological, while Mr. Pagliuca contends they are disorganized, missing dates, and that multiple books were used haphazardly by staff.
DOJ-OGR-00018937.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) discussing the admissibility of spiral-bound message pads used by household staff. The prosecution (Ms. Moe) argues these are valid business records created under strict instructions from the defendant, while the defense (Mr. Pagliuca) counters that many messages are undated and unsigned, though noting Ms. Hesse's messages were 'well maintained.'
DOJ-OGR-00013550.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a trial, dated August 10, 2022. An attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, is arguing to the judge that the prosecution should not be allowed to use a summary witness, such as an FBI agent, to compare pieces of evidence that have already been admitted. He contends that this constitutes summation, not testimony, and is essentially a premature closing argument, which is procedurally improper.
DOJ-OGR-00013373.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness, Ms. Hesse, by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. Ms. Hesse testifies that she knew women came to a residence to give massages, even when Maxwell was absent, and that she took messages for them. She also confirms knowing about Maxwell's home in New York but denies any knowledge of a residence in Miami.
DOJ-OGR-00013358.jpg
A page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring a legal argument regarding the admissibility of evidence under Rule 803.6 (Business Records). Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca argues that record-keeping practices were inconsistent after Mr. Alessi left in 2002, contradicting testimony by Alessi and Ms. Hesse. The discussion specifically concerns the admissibility of Western Union money transfer records.
DOJ-OGR-00013353.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It details a legal argument between the prosecution (Ms. Moe) and defense (Mr. Pagliuca) regarding the admissibility of spiral-bound message books kept by household staff, specifically Ms. Hesse, under the 'business records exception.' The defense argues that despite Ms. Hesse's records being well-maintained, other messages in the collection are undated and unsigned, challenging the consistency of the household practice.
DOJ-OGR-00013341.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing the beginning of testimony from a witness named Nicole Hesse. After being sworn in, Ms. Hesse states her name for the record and answers preliminary questions from an attorney, Ms. Moe, establishing her birthplace as West Palm Beach, Florida, and that she grew up in North Palm Beach.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity