DOJ-OGR-00001802.jpg
1.23 MB
Extraction Summary
11
People
4
Organizations
5
Locations
5
Events
9
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal brief / court filing
File Size:
1.23 MB
Summary
This page from a legal filing argues against the defense's position that a co-conspirator committing similar crimes without the defendant constitutes exculpatory evidence under Brady. The Government cites multiple Second Circuit precedents to establish that evidence of a defendant's non-participation in other criminal events or lawful conduct on other occasions is irrelevant to disproving specific charged crimes.
Organizations (4)
Timeline (5 events)
cocaine importations
robbing a bank
drug activity
racketeering conspiracies
narcotics conspiracies
Locations (5)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
Relationships (9)
→
→
→
→
→
→
→
→
→
→
→
→
→
→
→
→
→
→
to
Key Quotes (3)
"A single occurrence of lawful conduct is ‘simply irrelevant’ to other occurrences of lawful conduct."Source
DOJ-OGR-00001802.jpg
Quote #1
"A defendant charged with robbing a bank in Manhattan on April 22 cannot offer as evidence to disprove the charged crime that he did not rob the bank’s branches in Brooklyn or the Bronx"Source
DOJ-OGR-00001802.jpg
Quote #2
"Since a defendant cannot introduce evidence of innocent behavior on other occasions to prove his innocence, such testimony would not be exculpatory within the requirements of Brady"Source
DOJ-OGR-00001802.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document