Walker
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Conway
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-21 | N/A | Cops argument (legal proceeding) | Court | View |
| 2007-06-25 | Legal decision | The Western District of New York issued a decision in the case of Walker v. Conway. | Western District of New York | View |
EFTA00032184.pdf
Handwritten interview notes dated August 29, 2019, detailing the psychological oversight of Jeffrey Epstein at MCC New York leading up to his death. The notes cover his July 23rd suicide attempt/incident involving cellmate Tartaglione, his subsequent placement on suicide watch and psych observation, and his return to the SHU. The document highlights missed red flags (such as the signing of his will on Aug 8, which psych staff were unaware of) and systemic issues like understaffing and communication gaps between legal teams and medical staff.
EFTA00025524.pdf
This document is an email chain from September 2020 among USANYS staff discussing upcoming unit activities. A key update involves the planned arrest of Robert Adams, an MCC guard indicted for bribery and sexual misconduct. The email explicitly notes that Adams was working in the SAMS unit on the night of Jeffrey Epstein's suicide and that the current charges 'spun out of' the investigation into that night.
EFTA00018504.pdf
This document is an email dated October 8, 2020, likely from the U.S. Attorney's Office, summarizing upcoming oral arguments before the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. It highlights the case 'United States v. Maxwell' (referring to Ghislaine Maxwell), scheduled for October 13, 2020, concerning an appeal regarding a protective order. The email also lists arguments for 'Farhane v. United States' and 'United States v. Louis McIntosh'.
DOJ-OGR-00018344.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, presenting an argument for the admissibility of photographs taken long after the events in question. It cites legal precedents, including United States v. Causey (2014) and United States v. Smith (2020), to support the claim that such photos are relevant if they depict enduring scenes like buildings. The document also notes the defense's counter-argument regarding relevance and prejudice.
DOJ-OGR-00001802.jpg
This page from a legal filing argues against the defense's position that a co-conspirator committing similar crimes without the defendant constitutes exculpatory evidence under Brady. The Government cites multiple Second Circuit precedents to establish that evidence of a defendant's non-participation in other criminal events or lawful conduct on other occasions is irrelevant to disproving specific charged crimes.
DOJ-OGR-00020782.jpg
This legal document is a court opinion from case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on April 16, 2021. The court concludes that perjury charges against the defendant, Maxwell, are legally tenable and can be presented to a jury. However, the court rules that these perjury charges must be severed and tried separately from the Mann Act counts to avoid undue prejudice to the defendant, citing potential issues with admitting evidence of other acts and the risk of disqualifying Maxwell's chosen counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00002287.jpg
This document is page 9 of a legal filing (Document 120) in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on January 25, 2021. The text argues legal standards for the 'Severance of Offenses,' citing Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 14 and various precedents regarding when charges should be tried separately to avoid prejudice to the defendant. It lists numerous case citations including U.S. v. Mitan, U.S. v. Bradford, and U.S. v. Burke to support the argument that misjoined counts must be severed.
DOJ-OGR-00002287(1).jpg
This document is page 9 of a legal filing (Document 120) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on January 25, 2021. The text presents legal arguments regarding the 'Severance of Offenses' under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 14, citing various precedents to argue that counts should be severed if joinder prejudices the defendant. It discusses the legal standards for 'misjoinder' and 'substantial prejudice' required to grant a motion to sever.
DOJ-OGR-00002281.jpg
This document is page 'ii' (3 of 19) of a legal filing from January 25, 2021, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It is a 'Table of Authorities' section listing various legal precedents (cases) cited in the main document, including United States v. Halper and United States v. Burke. The document bears a Department of Justice Bates stamp 'DOJ-OGR-00002281'.
DOJ-OGR-00002281(1).jpg
This document is a Table of Authorities page (Page 3 of 19) from a court filing dated January 25, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It lists twenty-one legal precedents (cases) cited in the brief, primarily from the Second Circuit and D.C. Circuit, covering dates from 1964 to 2011. The document bears a Department of Justice Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00002281.
DOJ-OGR-00009238.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, in the case of U.S. v. Daugertas. The transcript details a legal argument regarding a request to close the courtroom for the testimony of a witness, Catherine Conrad, due to sensitive information about her alcohol dependency and disciplinary proceedings. The court denies the request, citing prior disclosures of the information and the defendants' right to a public proceeding. The transcript also reveals that Ms. Conrad intends to invoke her Fifth Amendment right, and counsel has submitted an application to compel her testimony with immunity.
DOJ-OGR-00009980.jpg
This document is a single page from an index of a court transcript for the case of United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al., dated February 15, 2012. The page, produced by Southern District Reporters, lists words alphabetically from "Tylenol" to "week" and provides the corresponding page and line numbers where each word appears in the full transcript. The document is marked with the identifier A-5697 and DOJ-OGR-00009980.
DOJ-OGR-00009301.jpg
This document is an index page (Page 12 of 130) from a legal transcript dated February 15, 2012, in the case 'United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas.' It was filed as Exhibit A-5697 in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330) on February 24, 2022. The page contains an alphabetical concordance of words used in the transcript (from 'Tylenol' to 'week'), including names like Viviann, Vivien, Walker, and Warren, along with their corresponding page and line numbers.
DOJ-OGR-00003009.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues against the admissibility of certain evidence in the case against Epstein. It cites multiple legal precedents establishing that proof of lawful conduct on some occasions is irrelevant to disproving a specific criminal charge. The document applies this to the Epstein case, asserting that a prior investigation's findings about his conduct in the 2000s are irrelevant to the current charges from 1994-1997, and notes that two key victims were only interviewed for the first time in late 2019.
DOJ-OGR-00002959.jpg
This document is page xxiv of a legal filing from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on April 16, 2021. It is a table of authorities, listing numerous legal case citations with corresponding page numbers where they are referenced within the larger document. The majority of the cases listed involve the United States as a party against various individuals and one corporation.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity