DOJ-OGR-00021897.jpg

683 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

2
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document (appellate court opinion/ruling)
File Size: 683 KB
Summary

This document is page 20 of an appellate court ruling (Case 22-1426, filed 12/02/2024) regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. The court is affirming the District Court's denial of Maxwell's motion claiming a 'constructive amendment' or 'prejudicial variance' to her indictment, specifically regarding testimony about sexual abuse in New Mexico. The text cites legal precedents involving the Fifth Amendment's Grand Jury Clause and standards for indictment.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant/Appellant
Appealing the District Court's denial regarding constructive amendment and prejudicial variance claims.
Jane Victim/Witness (Pseudonym)
Mentioned in a text fragment regarding intent to engage in sexual activity in violation of New York law.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
District Court
Lower court whose decision is being appealed.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Implied by the citation style (2d Cir.) and case number format; the court issuing this opinion.
Department of Justice (DOJ)
Indicated in the footer stamp (DOJ-OGR).

Timeline (2 events)

2024-12-02
Filing date of this specific document version (Case 22-1426).
Court of Appeals
Ghislaine Maxwell Appellate Court
Unknown (historic)
Testimony regarding sexual abuse
New Mexico
Witness

Locations (2)

Location Context
Location where testimony concerning a witness's sexual abuse took place.
Jurisdiction mentioned in relation to criminal offense laws.

Relationships (1)

Ghislaine Maxwell Legal/Criminal Context Jane
Mention of 'intent that Jane engage in sexual activity' in context of charges.

Key Quotes (3)

"Maxwell argues that testimony about a witness's sexual abuse in New Mexico presented the jury with another basis for conviction, which is distinct from the charges in the Indictment."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00021897.jpg
Quote #1
"We disagree and affirm the District Court's denial."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00021897.jpg
Quote #2
"To satisfy the Fifth Amendment's Grand Jury Clause, "an indictment must contain the elements of the offense charged and fairly inform the defendant of the charge against which he must defend.""
Source
DOJ-OGR-00021897.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document