DOJ-OGR-00003127.jpg
761 KB
Extraction Summary
11
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
0
Events
0
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court filing / legal memorandum
File Size:
761 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) arguing for the admissibility of evidence. It cites numerous Second Circuit precedents to establish that 'uncharged criminal conduct' is admissible in conspiracy cases when it explains the relationship between coconspirators or completes the story of the crime, rather than merely showing bad character. The text focuses on Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b).
People (11)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Quinones | Cited Case Defendant |
Subject of legal precedent United States v. Quinones
|
| Towne | Cited Case Defendant |
Subject of legal precedent United States v. Towne
|
| Diaz | Cited Case Defendant |
Subject of legal precedent United States v. Diaz
|
| Miller | Cited Case Defendant |
Subject of legal precedent United States v. Miller
|
| Thai | Cited Case Defendant |
Subject of legal precedent United States v. Thai
|
| Concepcion | Cited Case Defendant |
Subject of legal precedent United States v. Concepcion
|
| Pascarella | Cited Case Defendant |
Subject of legal precedent United States v. Pascarella
|
| Paulino | Cited Case Defendant |
Subject of legal precedent United States v. Paulino
|
| Zackson | Cited Case Defendant |
Subject of legal precedent United States v. Zackson
|
| Pipola | Cited Case Defendant |
Subject of legal precedent United States v. Pipola
|
| Rosa | Cited Case Defendant |
Subject of legal precedent United States v. Rosa
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Second Circuit Court of Appeals |
Jurisdiction cited for legal precedents (2d Cir.)
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (indicated by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR)
|
Key Quotes (3)
"[E]vidence of uncharged criminal conduct is not evidence of ‘other crimes, wrongs, or acts’ under Rule 404(b) if that conduct is ‘inextricably intertwined with the evidence regarding the charged offense.’"Source
DOJ-OGR-00003127.jpg
Quote #1
"Where “the indictment contains a conspiracy charge, uncharged acts may be admissible as direct evidence of the conspiracy itself.”"Source
DOJ-OGR-00003127.jpg
Quote #2
"uncharged acts are admissible in a conspiracy case where they are used to (i) explain the development of the illegal relationship between coconspirators; (ii) explain the mutual criminal trust that existed between coconspirators; and/or (iii) complete the story of the crime charged."Source
DOJ-OGR-00003127.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document