DOJ-OGR-00016758.jpg

541 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

5
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 541 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. Attorneys Ms. Comey and Ms. Menninger discuss with the Court the admissibility of testimony and specific emails involving Mr. Glassman (referencing 'The Lion King') and Mr. Rossmiller. The discussion centers on a prior ruling limiting testimony from attorneys to specific statements regarding whether testifying would help the defendant's case.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Ms. Comey Attorney (Prosecution)
Speaking to the court regarding the record and preclusion of testimony.
Ms. Menninger Attorney (Defense)
Discussing stipulations, emails, and potential testimony.
The Court Judge
Presiding over the discussion regarding rulings on attorney testimony.
Mr. Glassman Subject of testimony/Email author
Mentioned in relation to an email about 'The Lion King' and a statement about whether testifying would help the case.
Mr. Rossmiller Potential witness/Subject
Mentioned by Ms. Menninger regarding his 'potential' (likely testimony).

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Footer information.
Department of Justice (DOJ)
Implied by Bates stamp 'DOJ-OGR-00016758'.

Timeline (2 events)

August 10, 2022
Court filing date for the transcript.
Court
Unspecified
The Lion King
Unspecified

Locations (1)

Location Context
Jurisdiction of the court (likely SDNY based on case number AJN - Alison J. Nathan).

Relationships (2)

Ms. Comey Opposing Counsel Ms. Menninger
Exchanging arguments before the judge.
Mr. Glassman Associated subjects Mr. Rossmiller
Both mentioned in the context of attorney testimony/motions.

Key Quotes (3)

"I'm not sure what the status is of this email with Mr. Glassman about The Lion King, if that was a stipulation"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00016758.jpg
Quote #1
"Your Honor's ruling about testimony from attorneys was that the only permissible testimony would have been the email from -- the statement by Mr. Glassman about whether testifying would help her case"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00016758.jpg
Quote #2
"If this is implicated in the motion related to calling the three attorneys, then that was my ruling with respect to that."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00016758.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document