MR. ROSSMILLER
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
MR. WEINGARTEN
|
Opposing counsel |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
MR. WEINGARTEN
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Boies Schiller
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Your Honor (Judge)
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Adversarial prosecutor vs defendant |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unidentified Speaker (Defense)
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defendant (Epstein)
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Glassman
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Prosecutor state |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Adversarial prosecutor vs defendant |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Adversarial |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Judge Sweet
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Court hearing regarding the definition of confidential materials and subpoena compliance. | Courtroom (Presumably SDNY) | View |
| 2021-07-02 | Court hearing | A legal discussion regarding the precarious standing of a protective order granted by a deceased ... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2021-07-02 | Court hearing | A procedural discussion during a court hearing where the judge questions the government's motion ... | Court of the Southern Distr... | View |
| 2021-07-02 | Court proceeding | A discussion took place regarding a protective order for sealed documents in a libel lawsuit. The... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2021-04-01 | N/A | Court Hearing (Bail/Detention) | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 2019-09-03 | N/A | Court Hearing (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB) | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2019-07-24 | N/A | Court hearing regarding Epstein's release/bail. | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2019-07-24 | N/A | Court hearing regarding Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| 2019-07-24 | N/A | Court Hearing in Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2019-07-24 | Court hearing | A hearing regarding the defendant's potential release, where the government presented arguments a... | Courtroom | View |
| 2019-07-24 | N/A | Court hearing (Detention/Bail Hearing) in Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2019-07-24 | N/A | Court hearing regarding Jeffrey Epstein (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB) | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2019-07-24 | Court hearing | A court hearing regarding the defendant's proposal for home confinement and electronic monitoring. | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2019-07-24 | N/A | Court hearing regarding Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB (USA v. Jeffrey Epstein). Discussion centers on wh... | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| 2019-07-24 | Court hearing | A court hearing on the issue of remand versus bail for a defendant charged with sex trafficking. ... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2019-07-24 | N/A | Court hearing regarding bail/detention for the defendant. | Courtroom (implied Southern... | View |
| 2019-07-24 | Court hearing | A court proceeding (likely a bail hearing) where the government argues for the detention of a def... | Courtroom | View |
| 2019-07-24 | Court hearing | A court hearing where Mr. Rossmiller discusses evidence from Florida police reports and the gover... | Courtroom | View |
| 2019-07-16 | N/A | Court Hearing / Bail Argument | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| 2019-07-16 | Court hearing | A judge granted a joint request from the prosecution and defense for an adjournment and the exclu... | Courtroom in the Southern D... | View |
| 2019-07-16 | Court hearing | A legal argument was presented in court regarding the scope of a nonprosecution agreement from th... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2019-07-16 | Court hearing | A hearing to determine if the defendant should be detained pending trial. | Court | View |
| 2019-07-16 | Court hearing | A pretrial detention hearing where the government presented arguments for detaining the defendant... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2019-07-16 | N/A | Detention Hearing proceedings where defense requests adjournment to prepare bail package. | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 2019-07-16 | Court hearing | A court hearing was held to discuss pretrial matters related to Mr. Epstein, including a pretrial... | Southern District of New York | View |
DOJ-OGR-00000577.jpg
This is page 67 of a court transcript from July 24, 2019, in the case United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. The proceedings involve a discussion regarding victims wishing to be heard, with Mr. Boies present to represent them. Defense attorney Mr. Weinberg clarifies that Epstein does not concede the government's evidence and intends to mount a defense.
DOJ-OGR-00000571.jpg
This is page 61 of a court transcript from the Jeffrey Epstein case (1:19-cr-00490-RMB), filed on July 24, 2019. Prosecutor Rossmiller argues before the Court that pre-trial detention does not prevent a defendant from preparing a robust defense, citing the 'Zarrab' case as a precedent where a detained defendant had ample access to counsel and document review. The prosecution expresses willingness to consider factors like space and document review capabilities for the defendant.
DOJ-OGR-00000570.jpg
This document is page 60 of a court transcript from July 24, 2019, regarding the case against Jeffrey Epstein. Defense attorney Mr. Weinberg argues for Epstein's release and disputes the relevance of a 1982 passport cited by the government, while the Judge sets a 5:00 PM deadline for the next day's submissions. Prosecutor Mr. Rossmiller agrees to the filing schedule, and the court briefly mentions evidence potentially arising from the search of Epstein's East 71st Street mansion.
DOJ-OGR-00000563.jpg
This document is page 53 of a court transcript filed on July 24, 2019, concerning the detention hearing of Jeffrey Epstein (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). A defense attorney argues to the Judge that specific financial details ('values and accounts') and evidence of seizures should remain confidential to ensure Epstein's right to a fair and impartial jury in Manhattan, citing the enormous publicity surrounding the case. The speaker mentions opposing counsel Mr. Rossmiller at the end of the page.
DOJ-OGR-00000542.jpg
Transcript from a July 24, 2019 court hearing (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB) where Epstein's defense argues for his release. The defense claims Epstein 'disciplined himself' and cites a 14-year gap in allegations (referencing 2002 and 2005) as proof he is no longer a danger. The Judge ('The Court') challenges this position, quoting the defense's previous letter which stated any danger had 'abated' or 'evaporated.'
DOJ-OGR-00000537.jpg
Page 27 of a court transcript from Case 1:19-cr-00490 (USA v. Epstein) filed on July 24, 2019. Defense counsel argues for the defendant's release, citing his compliance with past registration (since 2010), jail time, and probation, while asserting that the Southern District of New York was not 'detached' from the Florida non-prosecution agreement. The Judge (The Court) responds by discussing the 'rebuttable presumption' for detention in cases involving children or young people.
DOJ-OGR-00000534.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on July 24, 2019, related to the Jeffrey Epstein case (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). Attorneys Weinberg and Rossmiller discuss the history of the 2008 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with the Court, specifically referencing a March 2008 meeting in Washington between the defense and the DOJ's Criminal Division/Child Exploitation Unit. The discussion highlights that the defense argued the case lacked interstate elements needed for federal prosecution, and the DOJ subsequently issued a letter in May 2008 endorsing prosecutorial discretion due to the 'unusual' facts of the case.
DOJ-OGR-00000530.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 24, 2019, in the case of USA v. Epstein (1:19-cr-00490). Prosecutor Rossmiller describes search warrant materials containing numerous photos of nude women and young girls, noting that one individual in the photos has self-identified as a victim. The discussion also covers the defendant's sex offender registration in New York, confirming he is classified at the 'highest status of risk for re-offense.'
DOJ-OGR-00000529.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 24, 2019. In it, an attorney named Mr. Rossmiller responds to the Court, stating that Florida police reports suggest the defendant harassed individuals through agents or investigators. Mr. Rossmiller also explains that the government took no position on the defendant's application to seal financial information because they were unsure what would be submitted and had little time to respond.
DOJ-OGR-00000528.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 24, 2019. In it, a representative for the government argues against a defendant's release, citing a significant danger to victims and witnesses. The government alleges the defendant previously instructed people to lie to law enforcement and has recently sent hundreds of thousands of dollars to two individuals, supported by police reports from Florida.
DOJ-OGR-00000527.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 24, 2019, during a bail hearing for Jeffrey Epstein. Prosecutor Rossmiller argues against bail, citing Epstein's extensive foreign connections and the discovery of an expired 1980s passport issued by a foreign country with a residence listed as Saudi Arabia. The passport contained Epstein's photo but a different name, which the prosecution uses to argue flight risk.
DOJ-OGR-00000526.jpg
This court transcript from July 24, 2019, captures a government representative, Mr. Rossmiller, arguing against a defendant's request for home confinement. Rossmiller contends the defendant's vast financial resources make them a flight risk, a claim bolstered by the recent discovery of a safe in the defendant's mansion containing large amounts of cash, diamonds, and a fraudulent foreign passport. The Court questions the specifics of this new evidence, such as whether the cash had been counted.
DOJ-OGR-00000524.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (dated July 24, 2019) in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). Prosecutor Mr. Rossmiller argues against bail, citing a strengthened investigation, the defendant's potential 45-year sentence, and the admission that the government can prove the defendant engaged in sex acts with minors. Rossmiller also criticizes the defendant's financial disclosure form as cursory and insufficient.
DOJ-OGR-00000520.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 24, 2019, from case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. In the transcript, a government lawyer, Mr. Rossmiller, argues before a judge for the pretrial detention of a defendant, citing an extraordinary risk of flight and danger to the community. Rossmiller states that for the sex trafficking offense charged, there is a legal presumption for detention which the defendant has not provided any information to rebut.
DOJ-OGR-00000429.jpg
This court transcript, filed on July 16, 2019, documents a judge scheduling a continued detention hearing for a defendant, Mr. Epstein, on July 11. The court orders Mr. Epstein to remain detained and directs him and his counsel, Mr. Weingarten, to see Judge Berman in courtroom 17B immediately. The transcript also includes a clarification from Mr. Weingarten that there is no statutory rape charge due to a lack of penetration.
DOJ-OGR-00000428.jpg
A transcript page from a July 16, 2019 court hearing (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). Prosecutor Rossmiller argues that the previous non-prosecution agreement was limited to the Southern District of Florida and that current charges involve New York victims, distinct from previous conduct. The Judge interrupts to object to the minimization of 'statutory rape' with the word 'only'.
DOJ-OGR-00000427.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 16, 2019, regarding Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. Defense attorney Mr. Weingarten requests an adjournment of a detention hearing until Thursday, which the Court grants. Prosecutor Mr. Rossmiller accepts the delay but provides a rebuttal argument, asserting that federal law charges trafficking rather than 'child prostitution' because children cannot consent to sex, and noting that force is not required for underage victims.
DOJ-OGR-00000424.jpg
This document is page 19 of a court transcript from Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB, filed on July 16, 2019. Defense attorney Mr. Weingarten requests an adjournment of the detention hearing to the end of the week to prepare a written bail package, noting they had just met the client that day. The government attorney, Mr. Rossmiller, does not object, provided the defendant consents to detention in the interim under statute 3142(f).
DOJ-OGR-00000416.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 16, 2019, detailing a pretrial detention hearing. A government representative, Mr. Rossmiller, argues for the defendant's detention by describing evidence found at his home, including a massage room consistent with victim accounts and electronic disks labeled with incriminating titles. Mr. Rossmiller concludes that the defendant represents a continuing danger to the community and a flight risk, justifying detention pending trial.
DOJ-OGR-00000410.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a detention hearing on July 16, 2019. The government's attorney, Mr. Rossmiller, argues that the defendant should be detained without bail pending trial, citing an extraordinary risk of flight and danger. The argument is based on serious charges, including a years-long scheme of trafficking and sexually abusing minors, and is supported by a recommendation for detention from Pretrial Services.
DOJ-OGR-00000408.jpg
This document is page 3 of a court transcript from Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB, filed on July 16, 2019. It records the proceedings where the prosecutor, Mr. Rossmiller, confirms Jeffrey Epstein was arrested on July 6 at 5:30 p.m. The Court then proceeds to read Epstein his Miranda rights and explains his rights regarding bail and legal representation.
DOJ-OGR-00000403.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on July 16, 2019. In it, a judge grants a joint request from the prosecution and defense to adjourn proceedings and exclude the time until Monday, July 15th, from speedy trial calculations. The judge justifies the decision as necessary to prevent a miscarriage of justice and to allow both sides adequate time to prepare, specifically mentioning a 'written bail submission'.
DOJ-OGR-00000401.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB) dated July 16, 2019. The text details a discussion between the Judge (The Court), defense attorneys (Weingarten and Weinberg), and the prosecutor (Rossmiller) regarding the scheduling of a bail application hearing, moving it from Thursday to the following Monday at 10:00 AM. The prosecutor, Mr. Rossmiller, requests a moment to confer with the defense and subsequently states that the government will rely on its initial submission.
DOJ-OGR-00000400.jpg
This is page 14 of a court transcript from July 16, 2019, in the case of USA v. Epstein. The judge asks the prosecution (Mr. Rossmiller) if other defendants are anticipated; Rossmiller replies that no superseding indictments are imminent but are possible. Defense attorney Mr. Weingarten then argues against current obstruction allegations by citing historical negotiations from 2007-2008, where federal and defense lawyers settled on a state statute plea deal rather than federal charges.
DOJ-OGR-00000399.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court hearing on July 16, 2019, in the Southern District of New York. The discussion centers on pretrial matters for a Mr. Epstein, including clarification that he has one effective passport and a debate over whether a pretrial report indicates he refused to provide financial information or was simply incomplete. The judge also questions another attorney, Mr. Rossmiller, about allegations of witness tampering by Mr. Epstein, confirming these will be part of the government's bail submission.
Allegations against Mr. Epstein
The Court references a letter from Mr. Rossmiller that described allegations of obstruction, harassment, and witness tampering by Mr. Epstein.
Unspecified information related to testimony
A communication between Jane and her lawyer, Mr. Rossmiller, is discussed. Ms. Menninger states that information came through her attorney, which is why Jane didn't know about it.
Detention and Defense Preparation
Rossmiller argues that detention does not prevent adequate defense preparation, citing the Zarrab case as precedent.
Victim Views
Rossmiller conveys that victims have expressed views to the government, which were then conveyed to the Court, and mentions efforts to reach out to victims.
Bail Hearing Arguments
Discussion regarding flight risk, foreign connections, and a fraudulent passport.
Defendant's flight risk and proposal for home confinement.
This document is a transcript of a dialogue between Mr. Rossmiller and the Court. Mr. Rossmiller argues that the defendant is a flight risk due to immense wealth and the recent discovery of a safe containing cash, diamonds, and a fraudulent passport. The Court questions Mr. Rossmiller for more specific details about the discovery.
Argument for pretrial detention
Mr. Rossmiller argues that the government seeks pretrial detention for the defendant due to extraordinary flight risk and danger to the community, citing prior actions, recommendations from pretrial services, victim requests, and the legal presumption in sex trafficking cases which has not been rebutted.
Presumption of detention
Mr. Rossmiller confirms the government's burden and argues that there are good reasons for a presumption of detention, especially since the defendant has a prior sex offense conviction.
Defendant's bail conditions and risk assessment
A speaker, presumably for the government, argues against the defendant's release, citing danger to the community, witness tampering, and a recent suspicious financial transaction. MR. ROSSMILLER confirms for the court that police reports are from Florida.
Defendant's actions and financial information
Mr. Rossmiller states the reports suggest the defendant harassed individuals and explains why the government took no position on sealing the defendant's financial information.
Rebuttal on charges
Argument regarding the nature of federal trafficking laws vs child prostitution.
Potential superseding indictments
Rossmiller states they do not expect imminent superseding indictments but it is possible later.
Inquiry about arrest details
Can I have the date and time of arrest, please?
Scope of a nonprosecution agreement
Mr. Rossmiller argues to the court that the Southern District of Florida believed its nonprosecution agreement was limited to its own district, implying that it does not prevent prosecution in the Southern District of New York. This argument is presented to counter the defense's position.
Pretrial detention hearing
Mr. Rossmiller describes evidence found at the defendant's home, including a massage room and electronic disks, and argues that the defendant is a danger and flight risk who should be detained pending trial.
Scope of a nonprosecution agreement
Mr. Rossmiller argues to the court that the Southern District of Florida believed its nonprosecution agreement was limited to its own district, implying that it does not prevent prosecution in the Southern District of New York. This argument is presented to counter the defense's position.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity