HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017838.jpg
2.19 MB
Extraction Summary
2
People
4
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document / court opinion headnotes (federal supplement)
File Size:
2.19 MB
Summary
This document is a page from a legal reporter (349 F.Supp.2d 765) concerning the case 'In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001', dated 2005. It outlines legal headnotes (53-60) regarding the court's decision that allegations against a Saudi Arabian Prince and the Saudi Royal Family—concerning business ties via Saudi Arabia Airlines and charitable donations allegedly funding terrorism—were insufficient to establish personal jurisdiction in the United States. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a Congressional document production.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabian Prince | Defendant |
Subject of jurisdictional dispute regarding funding of terrorism and business ties.
|
| Saudi Royal Family | Group |
Alleged to own substantial assets in the US and fund terrorist acts.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia Airlines |
Airline mentioned where the Prince was ex-officio Chairman.
|
|
| Federal Courts |
Legal body issuing the opinion.
|
|
| United States District Court (S.D.N.Y.) |
The court where the case was cited.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017838'.
|
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of business assets and jurisdiction.
|
|
|
Southern District of New York (Court location).
|
Relationships (2)
Ex-officio Chairman of Board
Donated money to charities
Key Quotes (3)
"Allegations that Saudi Royal Family members owned substantial assets in and did substantial business in United States... were insufficient to establish general personal jurisdiction over Prince in Antiterrorism Act (ATA) action"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017838.jpg
Quote #1
"Allegations that Saudi Arabian Prince aided and abetted terrorism, and that he donated to charities that he knew to be supporters of international terrorism, were insufficient to establish personal jurisdiction"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017838.jpg
Quote #2
"In general, great care and reserve should be exercised when extending notions of personal jurisdiction into the international field."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017838.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document