DOJ-OGR-00002286.jpg

756 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

10
People
5
Organizations
2
Locations
0
Events
0
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal filing / court memorandum (page 8)
File Size: 756 KB
Summary

This document is Page 8 of a legal filing (Document 120) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on January 25, 2021. The text presents legal arguments regarding the 'joinder' (combining) and 'severance' (separating) of criminal charges, citing various precedents to argue that offenses separated by time, location, or circumstance should not be tried together. It specifically addresses the standards for joining perjury or false statement counts with substantive crimes.

People (10)

Name Role Context
Alison J. Nathan Judge
Implied by case number suffix 'AJN' in header.
Blakney Case Law Citation
Cited in legal argument regarding 'similar charges'.
Rivera Case Law Citation
Cited in United States v. Rivera.
Werner Case Law Citation
Cited within Rivera citation.
Randazzo Case Law Citation
Cited in United States v. Randazzo regarding 'common scheme'.
Halper Case Law Citation
Cited regarding inappropriate joinder.
Martinez Case Law Citation
Cited in United States v. Martinez regarding severance of counts.
Brown Case Law Citation
Cited in United States v. Brown regarding severance.
Potamitis Case Law Citation
Cited in United States v. Potamitis regarding perjury counts.
Botti Case Law Citation
Cited in United States v. Botti regarding severing structuring charges.

Organizations (5)

Name Type Context
Department of Justice
Implied by Bates stamp 'DOJ-OGR'.
Second Circuit Court of Appeals
Referenced as '2d Cir.' in citations.
First Circuit Court of Appeals
Referenced as '1st Cir.' in citations.
Southern District of New York
Referenced as 'S.D.N.Y.' in citations.
Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Referenced as 'E.D. Pa.' in citations.

Locations (2)

Location Context
Jurisdiction mentioned in case citations.
Jurisdiction mentioned in case citations.

Key Quotes (4)

"“Similar” charges include those that are “somewhat alike,” or those “having a general likeness” to each other."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00002286.jpg
Quote #1
"Offenses are “connected” or part of a “common scheme or plan” if the counts “grow out of related transactions.”"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00002286.jpg
Quote #2
"joinder is inappropriate when “[c]ommission of one of the offenses neither depended upon nor necessarily led to the commission of the other; proof of the one act neither constituted nor depended upon proof of the other.”"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00002286.jpg
Quote #3
"joinder is not appropriate when the perjury or false statement allegations do not relate to, or have only a speculative connection to, the other charges in the indictment."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00002286.jpg
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document