DOJ-OGR-00009752.jpg
669 KB
Extraction Summary
1
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court filing / legal brief (government response)
File Size:
669 KB
Summary
This page from a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) argues against providing discovery materials (specifically a questionnaire) to 'Juror No. 50.' The prosecution contends that releasing this information would allow the juror to manipulate their testimony and argues that the juror lacks standing, citing various legal precedents. The document suggests Juror No. 50 attempted to destroy evidence and flee the media, and mentions the possibility of future charges for perjury or criminal contempt.
People (1)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Juror No. 50 | Juror / Subject of Investigation |
Subject of legal arguments regarding discovery and standing; accused of trying to distance himself from statements an...
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Department of Justice (DOJ) |
Indicated by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR.
|
|
| Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) |
Jurisdiction mentioned in case citations.
|
|
| 2d Circuit Court of Appeals |
Cited in legal precedent.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-03-11
Filing of Document 642 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
S.D.N.Y.
Government Attorneys
Court
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in a case citation regarding property forfeiture (United States v. All Right, Title & Int. in Prop...).
|
Relationships (1)
Government argues against providing discovery to Juror No. 50 and suggests potential criminal charges.
Key Quotes (4)
"sought to distance himself from his original statements, attempted to destroy evidence, and tried to flee from the media."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009752.jpg
Quote #1
"Any advance disclosure to Juror No. 50 of the questionnaire will undoubtably color Juror No. 50’s testimony and allow him to place himself in the best possible posture."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009752.jpg
Quote #2
"Although there may come a time when Juror No. 50 is entitled to this discovery—if he is charged with perjury, criminal contempt, or some other crime, for example—the time is not now."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009752.jpg
Quote #3
"Juror No. 50’s filings should be stricken or, alternatively, remain under seal."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009752.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document