Court of appeal
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000-01-01 | N/A | Court ruling that certain CDSA prohibitions were unconstitutional | Ontario, Canada | View |
019-02.pdf
This document is a Certificate of Good Standing issued by the District of Columbia Bar on June 27, 2023, certifying that attorney John M. Mcnichols is an active member in good standing, having been admitted on January 10, 2005. The document was filed on June 30, 2023, as Exhibit 19-2 in case 1:23-cv-03903-JSR (Government of the US Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.), likely to support a motion for the attorney's admission to the case.
DOJ-OGR-00000346.jpg
This document is page 4 of a legal memorandum filed by the government on July 12, 2019 (dated July 8), arguing for the pre-trial detention of the defendant (Jeffrey Epstein, Case 1:19-cr-00490). It outlines the legal standards of the Bail Reform Act, citing case law regarding flight risk and danger to the community, and emphasizes that because the charges involve a minor victim under 18 U.S.C. § 1591, there is a statutory presumption favoring detention.
DOJ-OGR-00000342.jpg
This document is the final page (14) of a government filing dated July 12, 2019, addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman, arguing against bail for Jeffrey Epstein. The text provides legal precedents establishing that sex trafficking laws (Section 1591) apply to consumers/buyers, not just suppliers, refuting the defense's legal arguments. The conclusion explicitly requests pretrial detention based on Epstein's wealth, flight risk, possession of lewd photos of minors, and history of witness interference.
DOJ-OGR-00000012.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (dated Sept 17, 2024) arguing that Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) was legally limited only to the Southern District of Florida (SDFL) and not binding on other federal districts. It cites the US Attorney's Manual and the specific text of the NPA authorized by R. Alexander Acosta to support the claim that the agreement contained limiting language regarding its scope. The text emphasizes that the negotiation history does not support an inference that the agreement was intended to apply nationwide.
DOJ-OGR-00021085.jpg
This document is page 38 of a legal brief (Case 22-1426, dated Feb 28, 2023) filed in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. It contains legal arguments attempting to distance the current case from the precedent set in *U.S. v. Annabi*, arguing that *Annabi* is an outlier regarding whether a plea agreement in one district binds another. The text consists primarily of extensive footnotes citing various Second Circuit decisions (*Prisco*, *Ashraf*, *Salameh*, etc.) that limited plea agreements to specific US Attorney's Offices, supporting the government's position against the Appellant (identified by case number as Ghislaine Maxwell).
DOJ-OGR-00021057.jpg
This document is page 'ix' from a legal filing, specifically Document 59 in Case 22-1426, dated February 28, 2023. It serves as a table of authorities, listing numerous U.S. court cases with their legal citations and corresponding page references within the larger document. The cases cited span from 1926 to 2017 and originate from various federal district and circuit courts.
DOJ-OGR-00002132.jpg
This document is page 8 of a legal memorandum filed on December 14, 2020, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). Authored by French attorney William Julié, it outlines the procedures of the Extradition Treaty between the USA and France, specifically detailing the 60-day limit for formal extradition requests following an arrest and the 'Ministerial phase' of the application process. It explains that if documents are not received within 60 days, the detained person is discharged, though they may be re-arrested later.
DOJ-OGR-00022089.jpg
This page is from a legal filing (Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT) dated April 24, 2020, arguing against a motion by defendant Thomas (likely Michael Thomas, a guard involved in the Epstein case) to disclose draft versions of an Inspector General's Report regarding the Bureau of Prisons (BOP). The text argues that such drafts do not yet exist and, even if they did, would be protected by the 'deliberative process privilege.' The document cites numerous legal precedents to support the claim that pre-decisional government documents are shielded from discovery.
DOJ-OGR-00021733.jpg
This page from a Department of Justice appellate brief argues against Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal regarding jury instructions. The document asserts that Judge Nathan correctly handled an ambiguous jury note concerning flight evidence and 'aiding and abetting' liability. It specifically references testimony by a victim named 'Jane' regarding flights on Epstein's private plane and commercial carriers to New York for the purpose of sexual activity.
DOJ-OGR-00021446.jpg
This legal document details the aftermath of the Jeffrey Epstein case concerning victims' rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). Following Epstein's death, a district court denied the victims' (petitioners') motion for remedies, such as rescinding the non-prosecution agreement, deeming the issue moot. The document also covers an appeal by a victim named Wild and the government's legal arguments that its CVRA obligations were not triggered because charges were never filed in the original district.
DOJ-OGR-00019653.jpg
A page from a legal filing (Case 20-3061) dated October 8, 2020, arguing against the immediate unsealing of Ghislaine Maxwell's April 2016 deposition. The text asserts that Judge Preska's unsealing order must be reviewed immediately because a post-trial appeal would be too late to prevent public release, which cannot be undone ('re-sealed').
DOJ-OGR-00010596.jpg
This document is page 5 of a defense filing (dated June 24, 2022) related to the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. It argues that the definition of 'victim' under the CVRA is narrower than sentencing guidelines and asserts that Maxwell's due process rights must be protected against new allegations in victim impact statements from accusers Annie Farmer and 'Kate' that were not cross-examined at trial. The document also attempts to impeach the credibility of Virginia Giuffre, noting she did not testify and alleging in a footnote that she failed to disclose prior abuse by a man named Ron Eppinger.
DOJ-OGR-00010433.jpg
This document is page 16 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on June 15, 2022. It presents legal arguments regarding sentencing guidelines for sex offenders, citing Congressional intent from 1998 and the specific guideline USSG § 4B1.5. The text argues that sentence enhancements should be applied to 'Repeat and Dangerous' sex offenders who pose a continuing danger to the public, supported by quotes from Rep. Deborah Pryce and Sen. Orrin Hatch.
DOJ-OGR-00010421.jpg
This document is page 4 of a 29-page legal filing (Document 662) in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on June 15, 2022. It is a table of authorities listing various court cases, statutes such as the 'Child Protection and Sexual Predator Punishment Act of 1998', and other sources like the Merriam-Webster dictionary and United States Sentencing Guidelines. The page numbers where these authorities are cited within the main document are also provided.
DOJ-OGR-00009752.jpg
This page from a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) argues against providing discovery materials (specifically a questionnaire) to 'Juror No. 50.' The prosecution contends that releasing this information would allow the juror to manipulate their testimony and argues that the juror lacks standing, citing various legal precedents. The document suggests Juror No. 50 attempted to destroy evidence and flee the media, and mentions the possibility of future charges for perjury or criminal contempt.
DOJ-OGR-00003005.jpg
This is a page from a legal filing (Government's opposition) in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The prosecution argues that the defendant's claims of prejudice due to pre-indictment delay—specifically citing dead witnesses, lost Epstein employees, and corrupted memories—are insufficient to warrant dismissal based on established legal precedents. The document cites various case laws (Marion, Snyder, Iannelli, King) to support the position that fading memories or unavailable witnesses are inherent in delays and do not automatically constitute actual prejudice.
DOJ-OGR-00002809.jpg
A Certificate of Good Standing from the District of Columbia Bar certifying that attorney Sigrid S. McCawley has been a member since June 2, 2000, and remains active as of March 24, 2021. The document was filed on March 26, 2021, as part of the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), likely to support McCawley's legal standing in the proceedings.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015604.jpg
This document is page 6 of a legal filing arguing against a subpoena issued by the Defendant to a non-party identified as Jane Doe No. 3 in a Florida defamation case. The filing characterizes the subpoena as harassment intended to put the non-party in jail and notes that the Defendant specifically requested documents relating to Bill Clinton and Al Gore. The document argues these requests are irrelevant and violate Florida Rules of Civil Procedure.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024732.jpg
This document is page 96 of a Cannabis Investment Report published by Ackrell Capital in December 2017. It details legal developments regarding cannabis legalization and medical use in the United States and Canada, referencing specific legislation like the CSA and CDSA. The document contains a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024732' Bates stamp, indicating it was included in document production for a House Oversight Committee investigation, likely as part of a larger financial or investment portfolio review, though the text itself contains no direct references to Epstein or his associates.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity