EFTA00027809.pdf
1.18 MB
Extraction Summary
8
People
4
Organizations
2
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Government notice of proposed procedures
File Size:
1.18 MB
Summary
This document is a 'Government's Notice of Proposed Procedures for the Determination of a Remedy' filed by the United States in the case of Jane Doe 1 & 2 v. United States. The government proposes a schedule where Petitioners must first submit their proposed remedies, followed by a 60-day period for the government to consult with victims before responding. The government argues this consultation is essential because potential remedies, such as rescinding Epstein's non-prosecution agreement, could negatively impact other victims who have already received compensation or wish to avoid further trauma.
People (8)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jane Doe 1 | Petitioner |
Victim in the civil action seeking remedy under CVRA.
|
| Jane Doe 2 | Petitioner |
Victim in the civil action seeking remedy under CVRA.
|
| Jane Doe 3 | Potential Plaintiff/Victim |
Motion to join as plaintiff was denied by the Court as untimely.
|
| Jane Doe 4 | Potential Plaintiff/Victim |
Motion to join as plaintiff was denied; was not known to government at time of Agreement.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Subject |
Offender who signed the non-prosecution agreement; required to compensate victims.
|
| Byung J. Pak | United States Attorney |
Attorney for the Northern District of Georgia, representing the United States.
|
| [REDACTED] | Special Attorney |
Representing the Southern District of Florida (names redacted).
|
| [REDACTED] | Assistant United States Attorney |
Signed the Certificate of Service (name redacted).
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Court where the case is being heard.
|
|
| United States Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Georgia |
Office representing the Respondent (USA) in this matter.
|
|
| United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida |
Mentioned regarding prior efforts to communicate with victims.
|
|
| Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |
Cited regarding violence prevention and trauma.
|
Timeline (3 events)
2019-02-21
Court's Opinion and Order determining CVRA violation.
Southern District of Florida
Court
Government
Petitioners
2019-03-01
Approximate date Government counsel (NDGA) became involved in the case.
N/A
Byung J. Pak
Special Attorneys
2019-05-10
Filing of Government's Notice of Proposed Procedures.
Southern District of Florida
United States Attorney
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction of the court case.
|
|
|
Address for the United States Attorney (Northern District of Georgia).
|
Relationships (3)
Listed together as Petitioners in the case caption.
Mention of the Non-Prosecution Agreement between Epstein and the government.
Listed as United States Attorney representing the Respondent.
Key Quotes (4)
"Petitioners have repeatedly discussed some form of rescission of the non-prosecution agreement ('the Agreement') as a remedy in this action."Source
EFTA00027809.pdf
Quote #1
"A rescission of the Agreement may impact victims who recovered damages pursuant to the Agreement by making their settlements subject to challenge."Source
EFTA00027809.pdf
Quote #2
"The government respectfully submits that a sixty-day period to consult with victims is both reasonable and essential to the Court’s determination of a remedy."Source
EFTA00027809.pdf
Quote #3
"Petitioners should file a pleading setting forth their requested remedy to clarify the relief sought before the government’s response."Source
EFTA00027809.pdf
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document