DOJ-OGR-00005238.jpg

759 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

9
People
4
Organizations
2
Locations
4
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal filing / court document (government memorandum/motion)
File Size: 759 KB
Summary

This document is Page 2 of a legal filing (Document 351) in Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on October 15, 2021. The Government argues that under Federal Rule of Evidence 412 (Rape Shield Law), the Court has the authority to set a deadline for defense motions regarding sexual behavior evidence earlier than the standard 14 days before trial. The text cites multiple legal precedents (Andrews, Rivera, Dupigny, Backman, Valenzuela) to support the request for an earlier briefing schedule to ensure victims' rights to be heard.

People (9)

Name Role Context
PAE Judge
Judge Paul A. Engelmayer (presiding judge in Case 1:20-cr-00330 and cited cases Andrews/Rivera)
JMF Judge
Judge Jesse M. Furman (cited in United States v. Dupigny)
Charles Alan Wright Legal Author
Co-author of Federal Practice & Procedure treatise cited as authority
Arthur R. Miller Legal Author
Co-author of Federal Practice & Procedure treatise cited as authority
Andrews Defendant (Case Citation)
Cited in United States v. Andrews
Rivera Defendant (Case Citation)
Cited in United States v. Rivera
Dupigny Defendant (Case Citation)
Cited in United States v. Dupigny
Backman Defendant (Case Citation)
Cited in United States v. Backman
Valenzuela Defendant (Case Citation)
Cited in United States v. Valenzuela

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
S.D.N.Y.
Southern District of New York (Court jurisdiction)
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California (Court jurisdiction cited in Valenzuela)
9th Cir.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (cited in Backman)
DOJ
Department of Justice (indicated by footer DOJ-OGR)

Timeline (4 events)

2019-10-23
Order in United States v. Dupigny
S.D.N.Y.
2020-01-29
Order in United States v. Andrews
S.D.N.Y.
2020-04-29
Order in United States v. Rivera
S.D.N.Y.
2021-10-15
Document Filed
S.D.N.Y.

Locations (2)

Location Context
Southern District of New York
Central District of California

Relationships (1)

Government Legal Party/Adjudicator Court
Government respectfully submits... Court can set an earlier briefing schedule

Key Quotes (3)

"This language plainly gives the Court authority to set a “different” time, not necessarily a “later” time, to require the defense to file a Rule 412 motion."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00005238.jpg
Quote #1
"Accordingly, the Government respectfully submits that the express terms of Rule 412 contemplate that the Court can set an earlier briefing schedule."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00005238.jpg
Quote #2
"Before admitting evidence under Rule 412, the Court “must conduct an in camera hearing and give the victim and parties a right to attend and be heard.”"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00005238.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document