EFTA00018026.pdf

55.5 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

6
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Email correspondence
File Size: 55.5 KB
Summary

This document is an email thread from July 30, 2021, relating to the case United States v. Maxwell (20-Cr-330). Attorney David Oscar Markus emailed Judge Nathan's chambers to submit a responsive letter regarding a government filing from June 30, 2021, explaining that he lacked filing privileges in the SDNY. Judge Nathan's chambers replied with an attached order.

People (6)

Name Role Context
David Oscar Markus Attorney
Author of the email to Judge Nathan; responding to a government letter filed on June 30, 2021.
Judge Nathan Judge
Recipient of the email; presiding judge in United States v. Maxwell (SDNY).
Jeff Pagliuca Attorney
Copied on the email (Defense Counsel).
Laura Menninger Attorney
Copied on the email (Defense Counsel).
Christian Everdell Attorney
Copied on the email (Defense Counsel).
Bobbi Sternheim Attorney
Implied by email address 'bcsternheim'; Copied on the email.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Nathan NYSD Chambers
The chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan, Southern District of New York.
Markus/Moss
Law firm of David Oscar Markus.
Southern District of New York
Jurisdiction where the case is being heard.

Timeline (2 events)

2021-06-30
The Government filed a letter directed at David Oscar Markus.
Southern District of New York
David Oscar Markus The Government
2021-07-30
Deadline for David Oscar Markus to respond to the court order.
Southern District of New York

Locations (1)

Location Context
Location of the court.

Relationships (2)

David Oscar Markus Legal/Professional Judge Nathan
Attorney corresponding with Judge regarding court filings.
David Oscar Markus Legal Ghislaine Maxwell
Involved in United States v. Maxwell 20-Cr-330, copying defense counsel.

Key Quotes (2)

"I have not entered an appearance in this proceeding and am not a member of the Southern District of New York, so I do not have filing privileges."
Source
EFTA00018026.pdf
Quote #1
"Accordingly, I am emailing this responsive letter to Chambers and respectfully request that it be filed on the public docket."
Source
EFTA00018026.pdf
Quote #2

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document