Bobbi Sternheim
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
22
Very Strong
|
40 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Lack of relationship |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
None |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
USANYS
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Co counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Co counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeff Pagliuca
|
Co counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense formally agreed that Government Exhibits 52A, 52D, 52E, 52F, 52G, and... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-07-22 | N/A | Sentencing hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Sentencing held for Ghislaine Maxwell on Counts 1ss, 3ss, 4ss, 5ss, 6ss. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell | District Court | View |
| 2021-12-18 | N/A | Jury Trial held before Judge Alison J. Nathan | Court | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense agreed that Government Exhibit 1010 may be received in evidence at tr... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal agreement | A stipulation was agreed upon by the defense and prosecution to allow Defense Exhibit A1 to be re... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-10 | Legal agreement | A stipulation was signed agreeing that Government Exhibit 1009 may be received in evidence at trial. | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-09 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings held | Court (before Judge Alison ... | View |
| 2021-12-09 | N/A | Jury Trial Proceedings | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Jury Trial held | Court (Judge Alison J. Nathan) | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Jury Trial as to Ghislaine Maxwell | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-12-02 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings held before Judge Alison J. Nathan. | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-30 | N/A | Jury Trial | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Jury Selection / Jury Trial Begins | Court | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Jury Selection / Jury Trial | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-28 | N/A | Stipulation agreed upon regarding the admission of Government Exhibits 1004 and 11-16. | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-11-22 | N/A | Service of the EVCP (Epstein Victims' Compensation Program) confirmed. | N/A | View |
| 2021-11-17 | Legal proceeding | Jury selection continued for Ghislaine Maxwell's trial and was adjourned. | Courtroom | View |
| 2021-11-16 | Legal proceeding | Voir Dire held for Ghislaine Maxwell's trial. Jury selection began and was adjourned. | Courtroom | View |
| 2021-11-15 | Pretrial conference | A pretrial conference was held for Ghislaine Maxwell. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-11-10 | Pretrial conference | A Pretrial Conference was held for Ghislaine Maxwell, with her present alongside her attorneys an... | Before Judge Alison J. Nath... | View |
| 2021-11-01 | N/A | Pretrial Conference | Court | View |
| 2021-11-01 | N/A | Pretrial Conference held before Judge Alison J. Nathan | SDNY | View |
| 2021-10-22 | Legal proceeding | Filing of a juror questionnaire for Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | United States District Cour... | View |
EFTA00032789.pdf
This document is an email dated April 16, 2021, from a Law Clerk for Judge Alison J. Nathan (NYSD) to the defense counsel (Cohen Gresser, Haddon Morgan and Foreman, Sternheim) and prosecutors (USANYS) in the case US v Maxwell (20-cr-330). The email serves to distribute an attached court order which was about to be entered into the public docket. The document marks a procedural step in the criminal trial of Ghislaine Maxwell.
EFTA00032783.pdf
This document is an email chain from April 22, 2021, concerning the case US v. Maxwell. It details internal communications within the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) regarding a draft response to a defense request for a 120 or 180-day trial adjournment. The chain includes an underlying email from Laura Menninger, counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, submitting the motion to Judge Nathan and arguing for the redaction of other clients' names based on attorney-client privilege rules.
EFTA00032686.pdf
An email dated April 9, 2021, from an Assistant US Attorney to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team regarding a new discovery production. The prosecution offers to send the files via FTP to the lawyers and notes that a CD with PDF-converted files (originally Excel) will be sent to the MDC for Ms. Maxwell to review.
EFTA00032021.pdf
This document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, dated September 15, 2021. It serves as notice that the government intends to call FBI Computer Forensic Examiner Stephen [Redacted] as an expert witness to testify regarding the extraction of data from seized electronic devices. The letter also reiterates previous government requests from 2020 and early 2021 for reciprocal discovery and expert witness notices from the defense.
EFTA00032004.pdf
This document contains notes from a conference call on November 25, 2020, between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel (Sternheim and Everdell). The discussion focuses on Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the MDC, specifically complaints regarding excessive surveillance (cameras, sleep checks every 15 minutes), invasive strip searches, and isolation compared to General Population inmates. Defense counsel explicitly links the extreme surveillance measures to the government's fear of a repeat of the Jeffrey Epstein suicide incident.
EFTA00031440.pdf
This document is a discovery production letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, dated April 14, 2021. It details the production of a single photograph (Bates number SDNY_GM_02753398) designated as 'Confidential' under a Protective Order. The letter is signed by U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss, with the specific Assistant U.S. Attorneys' signatures redacted.
EFTA00031437.pdf
A discovery letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team dated April 14, 2021. The letter documents the production of a single item, a photograph (Bates SDNY_GM_02753398), which is designated as confidential under a July 2020 Protective Order. The specific names of the Assistant U.S. Attorneys signing the document are redacted.
EFTA00031428.pdf
This document is an email thread from April 2021 between Defense Counsel Christian Everdell and Judge Alison Nathan's chambers (specifically Law Clerk Juan Ruiz Toro). The correspondence concerns a request by the defense to bring electronic devices into the courthouse via the Worth Street entrance for 'evidence views'. The final email confirms that Judge Nathan has signed an order granting permission.
EFTA00031113.pdf
A letter from US Attorney Damian Williams to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team dated November 24, 2021, detailing the production of discovery materials. The production includes Jencks Act and Giglio materials for potential trial witnesses, as well as courtesy materials for individuals the government does not currently intend to call. The letter also clarifies protective order designations for the enclosed documents.
EFTA00031016.pdf
This document is a discovery letter dated May 3, 2021, from the U.S. Department of Justice (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team. It accompanies the production of photographs (Bates range SDNY_GM_02753399 to SDNY_GM_02753431) designated as confidential under a Protective Order.
EFTA00030912.pdf
This document is an email chain from January 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel (Cohen & Gresser) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding various discovery disputes. Key issues include Maxwell's inability to access files on a CD at the MDC prison, requests for unredacted FBI reports from 2006, missing subscriber info in AT&T records, and clarification regarding missing pages from flight logs produced by pilot David Rodgers. The prosecution responds that the 'missing' Rodgers pages were produced in a separate file (SDNY_GM_00005650-5676) and confirms that a Daily Beast article referenced a document unsealed by a New Hampshire court, not leaked by the prosecution.
EFTA00030861.pdf
This document is an email chain and legal correspondence between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Cohen & Gresser) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding discovery disputes in January 2021. Defense attorney Christian Everdell lists eight specific issues, including the urgent need for a hard drive for Maxwell to review evidence in prison, missing subscriber info for AT&T documents, and specifically noting that the first 27 pages of flight logs produced by pilot David Rodgers ('Rodgers000001-000027') were missing. The defense also inquires about a Daily Beast article referencing a cell-site simulator affidavit that they believe was not properly unsealed.
EFTA00030569.pdf
This document is a formal response from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team regarding 22 specific discovery requests made on October 13, 2020. The government addresses requests for Epstein's diary, the 'Billionaires Playboy Club' manuscript, flight logs (implied in broader requests but not itemized), and the identities of minor victims, often denying immediate production based on Rule 16 restrictions or asserting that materials have already been produced. The letter also discusses the handling of potential 'Brady' and 'Giglio' materials, stating that impeachment evidence will be produced closer to trial.
EFTA00030092.pdf
A cover letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team dated March 12, 2021. The letter accompanies a discovery production of photographs and documents received from victims not referenced in the indictment (S1 20 Cr. 330), designated as confidential under a protective order.
EFTA00030083.pdf
An email from an Assistant US Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team regarding discovery production. The email confirms the production of materials related to victims not referenced in the specific indictment S1 20 Cr. 330 (AJN), pursuant to a court order from November 2020. The prosecutor requests an FTP link for transfer and notes that a CD copy will be sent to the MDC for Maxwell to review.
EFTA00030052.pdf
This document is an email header dated December 30, 2020, with the subject 'RE: Redactions'. It is addressed to Christian Everdell and copies several other attorneys known to represent Ghislaine Maxwell, including Mark S. Cohen, Bobbi Sternheim, Jeff Pagliuca, and Laura Menninger. The sender information and specific email addresses are redacted.
EFTA00029942.pdf
This document is an email chain from March 2021 involving Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Cohen & Gresser LLP) and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). Attorney Christian Everdell raises seven specific discovery issues, including the inability of Maxwell to access files on disks via the prison computer, missing attachments for over 109,000 emails, and significant metadata discrepancies where files extracted from Epstein's devices show modification dates (July 2020) well after his death and device seizure. The email specifically requests metadata overlays to correct these issues and inquires about a gap in document production numbers.
EFTA00029600.pdf
An email from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Everdell, Cohen, Sternheim, Menninger, Pagliuca). The email, dated September 15, 2021, transmits a government letter regarding 'Flatley' and a document labeled '3503-001', likely referring to Jencks Act material (witness statements).
EFTA00028733.pdf
A discovery production letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, dated May 20, 2021. The production includes 'Interlochen records' and native 'carved' image files from various electronic devices (identified by codes such as NYC024321) that were previously produced in PDF format. The letter and materials are marked confidential under a Protective Order.
EFTA00028646.pdf
This document is a chain of emails between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Cohen & Gresser; Haddon, Morgan & Foreman) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding discovery production disputes in Spring 2021. Key issues include technical difficulties Maxwell faced in reviewing digital evidence at the MDC prison (specifically reading disks vs. hard drives), missing attachments for over 109,000 emails, and metadata discrepancies for 'carved' or deleted files recovered from Jeffrey Epstein's devices. The correspondence details the logistical back-and-forth regarding file formats, USAfx transfers, and the potential need for judicial intervention (Judge Nathan) to force the MDC to accept specific hard drives.
EFTA00028585.pdf
This document is an email chain between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Cohen & Gresser; Haddon, Morgan & Foreman) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding discovery disputes. The defense raises seven key issues, including over 109,000 emails missing attachments, metadata discrepancies on files extracted from Epstein's devices, and difficulties providing discovery materials to Maxwell at the MDC due to technical and bureaucratic limitations. The prosecution responds with technical explanations regarding FBI CART processes, 'carved' or deleted files lacking metadata, and the conversion of VHS/cassette tapes.
EFTA00028571.pdf
This document is a chain of email correspondence between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Everdell, Menninger) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding discovery disputes in Spring 2021. Key issues include the defense's inability to view certain files on prison computers, missing email attachments (over 109,000), and technical disputes over metadata for 'carved' or deleted files recovered from Jeffrey Epstein's electronic devices. The prosecution explains that metadata for deleted files was not recovered and that certain images (nude and non-nude) were seized from CDs in Epstein's residences rather than extracted by CART from devices.
EFTA00028257.pdf
A letter from U.S. Attorney Damian Williams to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel dated November 9, 2021, regarding the production of discovery materials (Jencks Act and Giglio) for her trial. The letter explains that materials previously designated as 'confidential' are now marked with a specific reference to the Protective Order paragraphs to avoid confusion with classified document markings.
EFTA00027864.pdf
This document is an email chain from March 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Cohen & Gresser) and US prosecutors (USANYS). The defense raises seven specific technical issues regarding discovery, including the need to provide evidence on hard drives rather than disks for the prison computer, over 100,000 emails missing attachments, and metadata discrepancies where files extracted from Jeffrey Epstein's devices show creation dates after his death (July 2020). The email also mentions videos from SDFL and PBPD investigations.
EFTA00027861.pdf
This document is an email chain from March 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Cohen & Gresser LLP) and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The defense raises several technical discovery issues, including the inability of Maxwell to read discovery disks on the prison computer, missing email attachments, and corrupted metadata on files extracted from Jeffrey Epstein's devices (showing 2020 dates instead of original dates). The prosecution forwards these issues to their contractor (PAE) to address.
REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support as to Ghislaine Maxwel...
Defense filing in support of bail motion.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity