DOJ-OGR-00009936.jpg
1.01 MB
Extraction Summary
10
People
5
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
6
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
1.01 MB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, in the case of USA v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al. It features the direct examination of a witness, Catherine Conrad, by attorney Mr. Gair. The questioning focuses on impeaching Conrad's credibility by highlighting her history of alcoholism, pancreatitis, and a suspension from the practice of law by the Appellate Division for 'shocking disregard for the judicial system' and mental/physical disability. The document bears a DOJ-OGR Bates stamp, often associated with document releases related to high-profile inquiries, though the specific link to Epstein in this fragment appears to be the document batch source rather than direct content.
People (10)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Catherine Conrad | Witness |
Under direct examination; attorney suspended for disability/alcoholism; potential juror in question.
|
| Mr. Gair | Attorney |
Conducting the direct examination of Catherine Conrad.
|
| Mr. Okula | Attorney |
Opposing counsel; states 'No objection' to exhibits.
|
| Paul M. Daugerdas | Defendant |
Named in the case caption (United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al.).
|
| Judge Pauley | Judge (Mentioned) |
Mentioned in questioning regarding what he would have wanted to know.
|
| Justice Sachs | Judge |
Presiding Justice mentioned in PMD Exhibit 20.
|
| Justice Friedman | Judge |
Justice mentioned in PMD Exhibit 20.
|
| Justice Sweeney | Judge |
Justice mentioned in PMD Exhibit 20.
|
| Justice Nardelli | Judge |
Justice mentioned in PMD Exhibit 20.
|
| Justice McGuire | Judge |
Justice mentioned in PMD Exhibit 20.
|
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States of America |
Plaintiff in the case.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters |
Court reporting agency listed in the footer.
|
|
| Appellate Division, First Department |
Judicial body that issued findings regarding Conrad's conduct.
|
|
| Supreme Court Appellate Division departmental disciplinary committee |
Body where Conrad testified in 2009.
|
|
| DOJ-OGR |
Department of Justice Office of Government Information Services (implied by Bates stamp).
|
Timeline (2 events)
2007-12-01
Appellate Division finding regarding Conrad's conduct.
New York (First Department)
Appellate Division
Catherine Conrad
2012-02-15
Court proceedings in USA v. Daugerdas; direct examination of Catherine Conrad.
Courtroom
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implicit jurisdiction based on 'Southern District Reporters'.
|
Relationships (2)
Questioning revolves around whether Conrad disclosed her alcoholism/suspension to Judge Pauley (likely during jury selection or similar proceedings).
Mr. Gair is questioning Conrad aggressively about her history and credibility.
Key Quotes (6)
"evinces a shocking disregard for the judicial system"Source
DOJ-OGR-00009936.jpg
Quote #1
"suffered from a terrible disease of alcoholism for more than a decade"Source
DOJ-OGR-00009936.jpg
Quote #2
"One's never cured."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009936.jpg
Quote #3
"Yes, and I have pancreatitis."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009936.jpg
Quote #4
"If you take the boilerplate language literally."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009936.jpg
Quote #5
"I'm not the Court. I can't judge that."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009936.jpg
Quote #6
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document