DOJ-OGR-00019361.jpg
679 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
7
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal brief / court filing (appellate)
File Size:
679 KB
Summary
This document is page 19 of a legal brief filed on September 16, 2020, likely by the prosecution or a respondent opposing an appeal by Ghislaine Maxwell. The text argues that the cases Maxwell cited in her notice of appeal are irrelevant ('inapposite') because they deal with third-party intervenors (like the press or the CFTC) seeking to modify protective orders, whereas Maxwell is a direct party to the case. It specifically distinguishes the current situation from *Brown v. Maxwell* and other precedents regarding appellate jurisdiction over protective orders.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant/Appellant |
Mentioned regarding her 'notice of appeal' and legal arguments related to protective orders.
|
| Brown | Plaintiff/Intervenor |
Named party in cited case 'Brown v. Maxwell' (2019).
|
Organizations (7)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) |
Cited as a third-party intervenor in the 'Minpeco S.A.' case example.
|
|
| UNITE |
Party in cited case 'Pichler v. UNITE'.
|
|
| Minpeco S.A. |
Party in cited case.
|
|
| Conticommodity Servs., Inc. |
Party in cited case.
|
|
| Department of Justice |
Implied by Bates stamp 'DOJ-OGR'.
|
|
| Second Circuit Court of Appeals |
Referenced as '2d Cir.' in case citations.
|
|
| Third Circuit Court of Appeals |
Referenced as '3d Cir.' in case citations.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2020-09-16
Filing of Document 37 in Case 20-3061.
Court of Appeals (likely 2nd Circuit)
Relationships (1)
Citation of 'Brown v. Maxwell'
Key Quotes (3)
"The cases cited in Maxwell’s notice of appeal do not alter this analysis."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019361.jpg
Quote #1
"All three are inapposite because they involved appeals by intervenors — not parties — seeking to modify protective orders in civil cases."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019361.jpg
Quote #2
"appellate courts do not repeatedly intervene to second-guess prejudgment rulings."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019361.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document