DOJ-OGR-00009247.jpg

1 MB
View Original

Extraction Summary

6
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
7
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 1 MB
Summary

This document is a transcript from February 15, 2012, in the case of USA v. Daugerdas, filed as an exhibit in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It features the cross-examination of Ms. Conrad (a former juror who is a suspended lawyer) regarding her financial status, specifically establishing she had approximately $14,000 in assets versus her claim of indigence for legal counsel. The questioning highlights discrepancies between her court testimony and a sworn affidavit submitted to the Bar disciplinary committee regarding her tax returns and income.

People (6)

Name Role Context
Conrad Witness/Respondent
Being cross-examined about her finances, legal career, and truthfulness. Identified as a 'suspended lawyer' and someo...
Paul M. Daugerdas Defendant
Named in the case caption; Conrad mentions rendering a guilty verdict against him.
Judge Pauley Judge
Mentioned as having previously asked Conrad questions about her finances and appointment of a lawyer.
Mr. Okula Attorney
Makes objections on behalf of the witness or prosecution.
Mr. Gair Attorney
Conducting the direct/cross-examination of Ms. Conrad.
The Court Judge
Presiding over the current hearing, ruling on objections.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
United States of America
Southern District Reporters
The Bar
Referenced regarding a sworn affidavit submitted by Conrad.
Department of Justice
Inferred from footer 'DOJ-OGR'.

Timeline (2 events)

February 15, 2012
Court hearing/Examination of Ms. Conrad
Courtroom (Southern District)
February 28, 2011
Filing of affidavit/document by Conrad
N/A

Locations (1)

Location Context
Likely Southern District of New York (SDNY) based on the reporter name and case context.

Relationships (2)

Conrad Juror/Defendant Paul M. Daugerdas
Conrad refers to 'the guilty verdict I rendered against Mr. Daugerdas'.
Conrad Adversarial Mr. Gair
Gair is questioning Conrad aggressively about her finances and truthfulness.

Key Quotes (7)

"I wasn't a practicing lawyer."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009247.jpg
Quote #1
"Being a suspended lawyer."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009247.jpg
Quote #2
"That has nothing to do with the guilty verdict I rendered against Mr. Daugerdas, your client."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009247.jpg
Quote #3
"No, I have no idea. It's a sliding scale."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009247.jpg
Quote #4
"Ask my mother. I have no idea. I don't know what that means."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009247.jpg
Quote #5
"No, $400 total in the year."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009247.jpg
Quote #6
"Well, if it was filed in 2009, then your answer to the disciplinary committee question would have been untruthful, correct?"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009247.jpg
Quote #7

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document