DOJ-OGR-00009545.jpg
715 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
4
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing (court order/opinion)
File Size:
715 KB
Summary
This document is page 4 of a legal filing from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on February 25, 2022. It discusses a motion for a new trial based on 'Juror 50' allegedly failing to disclose information (specifically regarding childhood sexual abuse) during voir dire. The text outlines the legal standards for such a motion, citing Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33 and the Supreme Court case *McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. Greenwood*.
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court |
Implied by case number structure and references to Federal Rules.
|
|
| Supreme Court |
Referenced regarding the McDonough decision.
|
|
| 2d Cir. |
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, referenced in case citations.
|
|
| Department of Justice (DOJ) |
Referenced in footer stamp 'DOJ-OGR'.
|
Key Quotes (4)
"“[u]pon the defendant’s motion, the court may vacate any judgment and grant a new trial if the interest of justice so requires.”"Source
DOJ-OGR-00009545.jpg
Quote #1
"“a party must first demonstrate that a juror failed to answer honestly a material question on voir dire, and then further show that a correct response would have provided a valid basis for a challenge for cause.”"Source
DOJ-OGR-00009545.jpg
Quote #2
"During an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment, a juror may not testify about any statement made or incident that occurred during the jury’s deliberations"Source
DOJ-OGR-00009545.jpg
Quote #3
"The parties dispute certain contours of the McDonough test, including whether it requires a deliberately false answer."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009545.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document