DOJ-OGR-00021089.jpg

694 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

2
People
8
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal brief / court filing (appellate)
File Size: 694 KB
Summary

This page is from a legal filing (Case 22-1426, dated Feb 28, 2023) arguing that the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) signed by Jeffrey Epstein should be interpreted under Eleventh Circuit law rather than Second Circuit law. The text asserts that under Eleventh Circuit precedent, the NPA's promise by 'the United States' not to prosecute Epstein's potential co-conspirators (specifically including the Defendant) is binding on all U.S. Attorneys' Offices and any ambiguity must be resolved against the government.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Epstein Subject of NPA
Mentioned regarding the Non-Prosecution Agreement and 'potential co-conspirators'.
Defendant Appellant/Defendant
Included in the group of 'potential co-conspirators' allegedly protected by the NPA (Context implies Ghislaine Maxwel...

Organizations (8)

Name Type Context
United States
The Government; party to the NPA.
USAOs
United States Attorneys' Offices; argument concerns whether the NPA binds all USAOs.
Second Circuit
Court of Appeals; jurisdiction discussed regarding choice of law.
Eleventh Circuit
Court of Appeals; jurisdiction whose laws the document argues should apply to the NPA.
U.S. Tax Ct.
Cited in case law.
Shaheen Bus. & Inv. Grp., Inc.
Cited in case law.
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Cited in case law.
DRK Photo
Cited in case law.

Timeline (1 events)

Unknown (Historical)
Execution of the NPA (Non-Prosecution Agreement)
Implied Eleventh Circuit jurisdiction (Florida)
Epstein United States Government

Locations (2)

Location Context
Mentioned in legal citation and regarding contract law defaults.
Mentioned regarding conflict of laws.

Relationships (1)

Epstein Co-conspirator (Alleged) Defendant
Text refers to Epstein's 'potential co-conspirators' (including Defendant).

Key Quotes (4)

"Here, it is clear that the Second Circuit is not the jurisdiction with the most significant relationship to the NPA, and the Government has not argued otherwise."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00021089.jpg
Quote #1
"Instead, the court should have construed the NPA under Eleventh Circuit law."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00021089.jpg
Quote #2
"The Eleventh Circuit would hold that the NPA’s promise on behalf of “the United States” not to prosecute Epstein’s “potential co-conspirators” (including Defendant) is binding on other USAOs."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00021089.jpg
Quote #3
"the ambiguity “must be read against the government.”"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00021089.jpg
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document