John Wiley & Sons
OrganizationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00000232.tif
This document is a legal analysis discussing the scope of a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) involving Epstein, particularly concerning its geographical limitations and its application to both Epstein and his coconspirators. It argues against a broad interpretation of the NPA's terms, emphasizing that the agreement's protection from federal prosecution was specifically limited to the Southern District of Florida, and that it would be illogical for the NPA to protect coconspirators while leaving Epstein vulnerable in other districts.
DOJ-OGR-00000221.tif
This document is a Table of Contents and Table of Authorities from a legal filing. It lists sections of the document such as Opinions below, Jurisdiction, Statement, Argument, and Conclusion, along with their corresponding page numbers. The Table of Authorities section enumerates various legal cases with their citations and the page numbers where they are referenced within the main document.
DOJ-OGR-00015221.tif
This document is a bibliography or publication list detailing numerous psychological research papers, reviews, and book chapters authored or co-authored by E.F. Loftus and various collaborators between 1978 and 1980. The publications primarily focus on memory, eyewitness testimony, and related psychological phenomena, appearing in various academic journals and edited volumes.
DOJ-OGR-00021089.jpg
This page is from a legal filing (Case 22-1426, dated Feb 28, 2023) arguing that the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) signed by Jeffrey Epstein should be interpreted under Eleventh Circuit law rather than Second Circuit law. The text asserts that under Eleventh Circuit precedent, the NPA's promise by 'the United States' not to prosecute Epstein's potential co-conspirators (specifically including the Defendant) is binding on all U.S. Attorneys' Offices and any ambiguity must be resolved against the government.
DOJ-OGR-00021054.jpg
This document is page 'vi' (Page 7 of 113) of a legal filing dated February 28, 2023, bearing the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00021054. It is a 'Table of Authorities' listing various legal precedents referenced in the main brief, including cases such as 'Hudson Valley Black Press v. I.R.S.' and 'Martin v. Hadix'. The document appears to be part of a larger Department of Justice filing, likely related to a FOIA case or appeal given the OGR marking.
DOJ-OGR-00015241.jpg
This document is page 30 of a bibliography, identified as LOFTUS-046, listing academic publications primarily from 2013 and 2014. The works are heavily focused on the research of E.F. Loftus and numerous colleagues in the fields of psychology and law. Key topics include misinformation, false memories, eyewitness testimony, repressed memories, and legal system reforms.
DOJ-OGR-00021653.jpg
This document is a 'Table of Authorities' (page 'v') from a legal filing (Case 22-1426, Document 79), dated June 29, 2023. It lists various legal precedents and case citations used in the main document, including Supreme Court and Circuit Court cases. The document bears a DOJ-OGR (Office of General Review) footer, indicating it was likely released via FOIA or a similar transparency process.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016713.jpg
This document is page 15 of 42 from a financial disclosure report filed by Donald J. Trump, covering the period of January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2018. It details employment assets and income, specifically focusing on royalties received from various books published between 1987 and 2011. The document lists specific income ranges for 'The Art of the Deal' and 'Time To Get Tough,' while noting other titles generated less than $201 in income for the reporting period.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017555.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a biographical booklet or conference program (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017555), detailing the professional achievements of physicist Lisa Randall and botanist Peter Raven. It lists their academic affiliations (Harvard, Missouri Botanical Garden), awards, publications, and contributions to their respective fields. The text does not explicitly mention Jeffrey Epstein, though the document origination (House Oversight) suggests it is part of a larger collection of subpoenaed records likely related to scientific gatherings or foundations associated with him.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016079.jpg
This document is page 389 of a bibliography from a book, likely related to mathematics, logic, physics, music, or consciousness studies, given the titles listed (e.g., 'Gödel’s Theorem', 'Musicophilia', 'The Emperor’s New Mind'). It lists citations for works by prominent scientists and thinkers such as Roger Penrose, Douglas Hofstadter, Oliver Sacks, and Alan Turing. The page includes a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was produced as evidence for a congressional investigation, likely regarding Jeffrey Epstein's connections to the scientific community.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016076.jpg
This document is a bibliography page (numbered 386) from a manuscript titled 'Are the Androids Dreaming Yet?', likely produced as evidence in a House Oversight investigation (document number 016076). It lists references for Chapter 2 and Chapter 3, citing works from 1986 to 2011 on topics including psychology, artificial intelligence, communication theory, and body language. While the document stamp suggests it is part of an investigation file (potentially related to Epstein given the user context), the text itself is strictly an academic or literary reference list with no direct mention of Epstein or his associates on this specific page.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021264.jpg
This document appears to be a page from an academic chapter titled 'The Social Nature of Humankind' (Chapter 2) authored by John T. Cacioppo. It discusses social neuroscience, the evolutionary basis of social structures, and the concept of 'Mythic Individualism.' The document is marked with a House Oversight Bates stamp (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021264), suggesting it was included as evidence or background material in a congressional investigation, likely related to Jeffrey Epstein's connections to the scientific community and funding of researchers like Cacioppo.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity