DOJ-OGR-00021738.jpg
681 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal brief / court filing (appellate)
File Size:
681 KB
Summary
This page from a legal filing (likely a government appellate brief, dated June 29, 2023) argues against Ghislaine Maxwell's claim that Judge Nathan failed to explain the upward variance in her sentencing. The text asserts that Maxwell's argument is waived due to being cursory, and further details that Judge Nathan provided an extensive explanation regarding Maxwell's 'pivotal role' in the abuse of minors and the need for deterrence.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant/Appellant |
Subject of the sentencing discussion; described as having a 'pivotal role' in 'heinous and predatory' sexual abuse.
|
| Judge Nathan | Sentencing Judge |
Judge who imposed the sentence on Maxwell and whose reasoning is being defended in this document.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit |
Implied by citation '2d Cir. 2013'
|
|
| Department of Justice (DOJ) |
Indicated by footer 'DOJ-OGR'
|
Timeline (1 events)
Prior to 2023-06-29
Relationships (2)
Document references Maxwell's 'pivotal role' in 'sexual abuse of minor girls.'
Judge Nathan imposed sentence on Maxwell.
Key Quotes (4)
"Maxwell’s one-sentence argument is so cursory and undeveloped that it should be deemed waived."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021738.jpg
Quote #1
"Judge Nathan engaged in a lengthy discussion of the sentencing factors when imposing sentence, including Maxwell’s 'pivotal role' in 'heinous and predatory' sexual abuse of minor girls."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021738.jpg
Quote #2
"the damage done to these young girls was incalculable"Source
DOJ-OGR-00021738.jpg
Quote #3
"nobody is above the law."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021738.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document