DOJ-OGR-00016772.jpg
602 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
602 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell argues to revisit a ruling to allow the defense to call FBI case agents as witnesses to question their investigative thoroughness, arguing that 'Jane's testimony' made this a live issue. The Court pushes back, citing the Second Circuit case 'Saldarriaga' and maintaining that the government's investigative techniques do not prove the defendant's innocence.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding judge (implied Judge Alison J. Nathan based on case number AJN) ruling on defense motions regarding witness...
|
| Mr. Everdell | Defense Attorney |
Defense counsel (Christian Everdell) arguing to revisit a ruling to call FBI agents as witnesses.
|
| Jane | Witness/Victim |
Referenced as 'Jane's testimony', which the defense claims made the issue of FBI investigation 'live' again.
|
| FBI Case Agents | Law Enforcement/Potential Witnesses |
The defense seeks to call them to ask about their investigation methods, subpoenas, and interviews.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| FBI |
Federal Bureau of Investigation, whose agents the defense wishes to question.
|
|
| Second Circuit |
Federal Court of Appeals, cited by the judge regarding the 'Saldarriaga' precedent.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting agency listed in the footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice, implied by the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2022-08-10
Court proceeding where the Defense attempts to revisit a ruling precluding them from calling FBI agents as witnesses.
Courtroom (likely SDNY)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied jurisdiction based on the court reporters and case number format.
|
Relationships (1)
Courtroom dialogue, Everdell addressing 'Your Honor'.
Key Quotes (3)
"the government's use or nonuse of certain investigative techniques does not tend to show the defendant's innocence of the charges."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016772.jpg
Quote #1
"I suppose words have meaning in the eyes of the beholder, but what you're suggesting is directly contrary to my ruling."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016772.jpg
Quote #2
"And because this issue became a live issue when we had Jane's testimony, I thought it appropriate to see if we could revisit this to see"Source
DOJ-OGR-00016772.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document