DOJ-OGR-00001853.jpg
969 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal correspondence / court filing
File Size:
969 KB
Summary
This document is page 3 of a legal letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated November 25, 2020, filed on December 4, 2020. The defense argues against the public identification of Ms. Maxwell's bail sureties (co-signers), citing significant privacy interests and fears of harassment for the sureties and their children. The defense requests an in camera conference and notes that the government consents to sealing the names of cosigners and confidential discovery materials but opposes the conference.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alison J. Nathan | Judge |
Recipient of the letter, presiding judge (The Honorable)
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the bail hearing and privacy concerns; referred to as 'Ms. Maxwell'
|
| Judge Carter | Judge |
Cited as precedent in United States v. Nejad regarding redaction of bail materials
|
| Sureties | Potential Co-signers |
Unnamed individuals offering to co-sign Maxwell's bail; defense argues for their anonymity
|
| Accusers | Victims/Witnesses |
Mentioned for comparison regarding anonymity rights
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court |
Implied by 'The Honorable Alison J. Nathan' and case number format
|
|
| Department of Justice (DOJ) |
Referenced in footer DOJ-OGR-00001853
|
|
| The Government |
Prosecution team, consulted regarding redactions
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Southern District of New York, mentioned in case citation 1:18-cr-00224-AJN
|
Relationships (2)
Sureties providing bail support, fearing harassment for association
Document states they have 'already suffered significant consequences'
Key Quotes (4)
"If Ms. Maxwell’s sureties are publicly identified, they will be harassed simply for their association with and support of her."Source
DOJ-OGR-00001853.jpg
Quote #1
"The sureties are legitimately scared that they and their children will suffer the same consequences, and may not be able to come forward at all, if the Court does not allow their letters and their identities to be sealed."Source
DOJ-OGR-00001853.jpg
Quote #2
"[C]ourts have the power to insure that their records are not used to gratify private spite or promote public scandal"Source
DOJ-OGR-00001853.jpg
Quote #3
"The privacy interests at stake here are significantly higher, given the documented threats against Ms. Maxwell and harassment of her family and friends."Source
DOJ-OGR-00001853.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document