accusers
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Personal Injury Lawyers
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
lawyers
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
accusers
|
Peer |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Personal Injury Lawyers
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ghislaine
|
Alleged association |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Continued contact |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ghislaine
|
Alleged |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Defendant witnesses |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Civil Attorneys
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein's estate
|
Financial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Victim perpetrator |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jurors
|
Judicial evaluation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Personal Injury Lawyer
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
FBI
|
Interviewed by |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Lawyers
|
Represented by |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Period when alleged events took place (described as 'over 25 years ago') | Unknown | View |
| N/A | Trial | The document requests a court order regarding the language to be used during an upcoming trial, s... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trip | Accusers traveled with Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal trial | The trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, where a juror reported that some jurors initially doubted the acc... | United States | View |
| N/A | Trial | The trial for which jurors were being selected, where the central issue was the credibility of ac... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trial | Ghislaine Maxwell's sex-trafficking trial, which lasted four weeks. | lower Manhattan | View |
| N/A | Interviews | Interviews of accusers were conducted, but were not recorded and transcripts are not available. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trial | A contested trial of Ms. Maxwell where the central issue was the credibility of the accusers. The... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Depositions | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Government interviews with accusers | Unknown | View |
| 2022-06-22 | N/A | Trial | Court | View |
| 2021-01-01 | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell Trial | Court | View |
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Accusers obtained lawyers before talking to the FBI in connection with the case. | FBI (contextual) | View |
| 1994-01-01 | N/A | Alleged conduct underlying the conspiracy charged in the indictment. | Unspecified | View |
| 0015-01-01 | N/A | Historical events involving Epstein and the accusers. | Unspecified | View |
| 0015-01-01 | Manipulation/grooming | Jeffrey Epstein manipulated people around him, including Ghislaine, and groomed individuals to en... | N/A | View |
EFTA00009890.pdf
This document is an email thread between defense and government counsel in the US v Maxwell case, dated April 19-20, 2021. The correspondence concerns scheduling a conferral call and negotiating specific redactions for several 'Reply Briefs' and exhibits to be filed on the public docket. Key issues include protecting the identities of accusers, third parties, and AUSAs, as well as handling confidential exhibits under seal.
DOJ-OGR-00001853.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated November 25, 2020, filed on December 4, 2020. The defense argues against the public identification of Ms. Maxwell's bail sureties (co-signers), citing significant privacy interests and fears of harassment for the sureties and their children. The defense requests an in camera conference and notes that the government consents to sealing the names of cosigners and confidential discovery materials but opposes the conference.
DOJ-OGR-00001235.jpg
This is a page from a legal filing (likely a renewed bail application) for Ghislaine Maxwell, dated February 23, 2021. The defense argues that new bond conditions secure her assets to prevent flight, cites twelve pretrial motions filed by January 25 that challenge the government's case, and claims she has been unfairly demonized by the media as a 'substitute replacement' for Jeffrey Epstein. The document asserts Maxwell's determination to face her accusers at trial.
DOJ-OGR-00000932.jpg
This legal document page (dated April 1, 2021) argues that the government lacks any contemporaneous documentary evidence (emails, texts, police reports) to corroborate allegations against Ghislaine Maxwell regarding conduct between 1994 and 1997. The defense asserts that Maxwell is being prosecuted as a 'substitute' for Jeffrey Epstein following his 'inexplicable death' at the MCC, noting that she was not named in Epstein's original indictment.
DOJ-OGR-00000924.jpg
This is a page from a legal filing dated April 1, 2021, arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail. The text details a proposed bail package valued at over $28.5 million, including $22.5 million in personal/spousal assets, $5 million from friends/family, and a $1 million bond from a security company. The defense argues that Maxwell has no intention of fleeing and is willing to renounce her British and French citizenship to prove it.
DOJ-OGR-00000921.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Procedural History) dated April 1, 2021, detailing the arrest and bail applications regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. It outlines her arrest on July 2, 2020, the government's allegations that she groomed minors for Jeffrey Epstein, and the subsequent legal motions leading to her detention order following a Zoom hearing where no accusers testified.
DOJ-OGR-00021071.jpg
This document is page 24 of an appellate brief (Case 22-1426, dated Feb 28, 2023) arguing two main points: first, that the statute of limitations had expired for the offenses charged because the 2003 amendment to ยง3283 cannot be applied retroactively to offenses committed before its enactment. Second, it argues for a new trial based on juror misconduct, specifically that a juror lied on a questionnaire to conceal his own history as a victim of child sexual abuse, which the defense argues established bias.
DOJ-OGR-00016153.jpg
This document is an excerpt from an opening statement by Ms. Sternheim in a trial, likely involving Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on August 10, 2022. It details how Jeffrey Epstein manipulated individuals, including Ghislaine, over 15 to 25 years ago. The statement also discusses how Epstein's estate established a compensation fund from which accusers received millions of dollars, and how these women easily included Ghislaine Maxwell in their claims, implying the focus should remain on Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00017167.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal summation delivered by Ms. Menninger on August 10, 2022. She argues that the accusers' memories may be unreliable by explaining psychological concepts such as autosuggestion and memory contamination. Menninger suggests that factors like discussions with lawyers, media, other accusers, and the prospect of financial recovery from lawsuits or a victims' compensation fund could have distorted their recollections.
DOJ-OGR-00009187.jpg
This document is a court filing (Document 615 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on February 24, 2022. It consists of a printout of a Reuters news article dated January 5, 2022, written by Luc Cohen, titled 'Some Ghislaine Maxwell jurors initially doubted accusers, juror says.' The page bears a Department of Justice Bates stamp (DOJ-OGR-00009187).
DOJ-OGR-00013656.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing a sidebar discussion in a legal case. Attorneys Ms. Pomerantz and Ms. Menninger, along with 'The Court,' debate the nature and admissibility of a 'prior consistent statement' and its implications for impeaching a witness. The discussion centers on a statement made by an unnamed individual to her mother, 'I wasn't raped,' and whether its elicitation would pose further legal problems.
DOJ-OGR-00010472.jpg
This legal document details the allegedly poor and dehumanizing conditions of Ms. Maxwell's pre-trial detention. It argues that inadequate nutrition, sleep deprivation, psychological threats, and significant technical difficulties with discovery materials severely weakened her and thwarted her ability to prepare her defense. The document suggests these conditions were intentionally imposed to satisfy various government and legal parties following Epstein's death.
DOJ-OGR-00005514.jpg
This document is page 59 of a court filing (Document 382) in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on October 29, 2021. The defense argues against the government's motion to exclude evidence, asserting that they have the right to reference evidence in opening statements if they have a good-faith belief it is admissible. Specifically, the defense intends to introduce evidence showing that Jeffrey Epstein abused many victims without Maxwell's knowledge or participation, arguing this is relevant to refuting the conspiracy charge, while the government attempts to characterize this as inadmissible 'good acts' or 'propensity' evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00014481.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of the summation (closing argument) by defense attorney Ms. Menninger in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. Menninger argues that Maxwell is innocent and that the prosecution's case relies on stories manipulated by personal injury lawyers and motivated by money. She asserts that the government successfully proved Jeffrey Epstein was a manipulator and abuser, but failed to connect those actions to Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00011717.jpg
This document is page 52 of a court transcript (Document 741, filed Aug 10, 2022) featuring the opening statement by defense attorney Ms. Sternheim in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Sternheim argues there is a lack of documentation or eyewitnesses to corroborate the government's charges. She characterizes Jeffrey Epstein as a wealthy, mysterious 'manipulator' comparable to James Bond, who lived a compartmentalized life with specific eccentricities, and alleges that accusers are motivated by financial gain ('shaking the money tree').
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Epstein Estate/Funds | accusers | $0.00 | Defense claims 'millions of dollars have fallen... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | accusers | $0.00 | Paid millions of dollars to accusers under the ... | View |
No Subject
Accusers offered to send photos to Epstein while he was in jail.
Legal case
The document states that the accusers talked to their lawyers.
Their accusations/case
The document states that many accusers talked to the media.
Their accusations/case
The document states that the accusers talked to other accusers.
Interviews/Statements
Accusers brought to FBI by personal injury lawyers.
Investigation
Interviews regarding allegations; defense notes these were not recorded and no transcripts exist.
Investigation
Interviews with dozens of accusers that were not recorded or transcribed.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity