DOJ-OGR-00016488.jpg
544 KB
Extraction Summary
9
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
544 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. The court discusses the preclusion of testimony from witnesses Mr. Scarola and Mr. Edwards on 401/403 grounds, allowing the defense to release them. Additionally, the court addresses a government objection to a defense exhibit regarding a 1996 sale agreement for the defendant's home at 44 Kinnerton Street in London.
People (9)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Glassman | Witness/Attorney |
His testimony is discussed regarding the impeachment of 'Jane'.
|
| Jane | Witness/Victim |
Subject of potential impeachment regarding motive to testify or contradiction.
|
| Mr. Rohrbach | Attorney (Government) |
Representing the government, confirmed no questions.
|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Attorney (Defense) |
Seeking clarification on precluded witnesses to release them.
|
| Mr. Scarola | Potential Witness |
Testimony precluded by the court; released from appearing.
|
| Mr. Edwards | Potential Witness |
Testimony precluded by the court; released from appearing.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, ruling on preclusions and objections.
|
| Mr. Everdell | Attorney (Defense) |
Confirming the trial mark for the London home exhibit.
|
| The Defendant | Defendant |
Referenced regarding ownership of the London home (implicitly Ghislaine Maxwell based on case number).
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Footer information.
|
|
| Government |
Mentioned by Mr. Rohrbach and regarding an objection.
|
Timeline (2 events)
August 10, 2022
Court hearing regarding witness testimony and evidence admissibility in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
Courtroom (Southern District)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Address of the defendant's home, subject of a sale agreement exhibit dated 1996.
|
Relationships (2)
Glassman's testimony is being used to impeach Jane.
Both are being precluded and released from testifying at the same time.
Key Quotes (4)
"the jury could find that Mr. Glassman's testimony tends to impeach Jane either as to motive to testify or impeachment by contradiction or both."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016488.jpg
Quote #1
"You're precluding testimony from Mr. Scarola and Mr. Edwards."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016488.jpg
Quote #2
"Yes, on the 401/403 grounds."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016488.jpg
Quote #3
"There's a government objection to preclude, pursuant to Rule 16, an exhibit that I gather purports to be a sale agreement for the defendant's home in -- house in London at 44 Kinnerton Street dated 1996."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016488.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document