DOJ-OGR-00001462.jpg
555 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing (appellate brief/motion response)
File Size:
555 KB
Summary
This document is page 22 of a legal filing dated May 27, 2021, arguing against Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for release. The text asserts that Judge Nathan did not abuse her discretion in detaining Maxwell as a flight risk and highlights Maxwell's extensive access to discovery materials via computers (13 hours/day) and legal counsel via video calls (25 hours/week) at the MDC.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Maxwell | Defendant/Appellant |
Subject of detention order; described as a flight risk.
|
| Judge Nathan | Judge (District Court) |
The judge who originally detained Maxwell and denied temporary release.
|
Timeline (2 events)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Detention center where Maxwell is held.
|
Relationships (2)
Judge Nathan committed clear error when detaining Maxwell
review discovery with her attorneys during the 25 hours of legal video-teleconference calls
Key Quotes (3)
"Nothing in the renewed motion undermines Judge Nathan’s conclusion that Maxwell poses a real risk of flight."Source
DOJ-OGR-00001462.jpg
Quote #1
"Simply put, the renewed motion fails to present any “compelling” reason for this Court to reverse its prior decision in this case."Source
DOJ-OGR-00001462.jpg
Quote #2
"Maxwell has exclusive access to both a desktop and a laptop computer on which to review her discovery, thirteen hours per day, seven days per week."Source
DOJ-OGR-00001462.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document