DOJ-OGR-00002837.jpg

753 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court filing / legal opinion
File Size: 753 KB
Summary

This document is page 16 of a court filing (Document 589) filed on March 24, 2021, in the case of United States v. Schulte (Case 1:17-cr-00548-PAC). The text details the Court's rejection of Schulte's arguments that the Jury Plan systematically excludes African Americans and Hispanic Americans. The Court rules that factors such as the COVID-19 pandemic, the frequency of people moving residences, and the use of voter registration lists do not constitute constitutional violations under the Sixth or Fifth Amendments.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Schulte Defendant/Appellant
Arguing that the Jury Plan systematically excludes certain demographic groups.
Rioux Legal Precedent
Referenced in case citation (Rioux, 97 F.3d at 658).
Schanbarger Legal Precedent
Referenced in case citation regarding voter registration lists.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
The Court
The entity issuing the opinion and rejecting Schulte's arguments.
Second Circuit
Referenced as binding precedent (Second Circuit’s decision in Schanbarger).
DOJ
Implied by the footer 'DOJ-OGR' (Department of Justice - Office of Government Relations).

Timeline (2 events)

2020-2021 (Implied)
COVID-19 pandemic
Global/The District
Recurring every 4 years
Replenishment of the master wheels (Jury Plan)
The District

Locations (2)

Location Context
Specific location mentioned regarding the exclusion of 'inactive voters' in certain counties.
Refers to the judicial district where the proceedings are taking place.

Relationships (1)

Schulte Legal Adversary The Court
Schulte argues... The Court remains unpersuaded.

Key Quotes (3)

"the true cause of the exclusion—younger people moving more often—is an external force, not a systematic defect inherent in the Jury Plan."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00002837.jpg
Quote #1
"At bottom, the Court cannot charge the District’s Jury Plan with a Sixth Amendment violation because of how often people move residences throughout the District."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00002837.jpg
Quote #2
"“[A] jury venire drawn from voter registration lists violates neither the Sixth Amendment’s fair cross-section requirement nor the Fifth Amendment’s guarantee of Equal protection.”"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00002837.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document