White Plains
LocationRelationship Network
EFTA00032947.pdf
This document is a Law360 White Collar email newsletter from December 13, 2019. It summarizes various legal news stories, including a $30M bail for a former Braskem executive, a fraud trial involving HP and Autonomy's Mike Lynch, and charges against former NFL players for health plan fraud. The document also lists numerous law firms and companies mentioned in legal proceedings, including 'Epstein Becker Green', though there is no direct context linking this to Jeffrey Epstein's criminal cases in this specific text.
EFTA00032047.pdf
This document is an email chain between the FBI's NY Computer Analysis Response Team (CART) and the US Attorney's Office regarding the processing of digital evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein's New York and Virgin Islands properties. The correspondence highlights significant technical challenges, including massive data volumes (terabytes), compatibility issues between forensic tools and the Relativity review platform, and delays caused by COVID-19 and FBI network upgrades. Key discussions involve the identification of specific devices (servers, laptops, hard drives), the urgency of discovery for potential additional charges, and the logistics of physically transferring hard drives containing evidence.
EFTA00031366.pdf
This document is an email chain from December 3-7, 2018, between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY), the FBI, and the NYPD Child Exploitation Human Trafficking Task Force regarding a 'New Investigation' (implied to be the Epstein case based on attachments). The participants coordinate a meeting to discuss the case, noting that some agents were 'just assigned' to it. The emails confirm the transmission of key evidence files, specifically listing attachments named 'Palm Beach Police Reports.pdf', 'Epstein Blackbook.pdf', and 'Flight Logs.pdf'. No actual flight data is contained in the text, only the filename of the attachment.
EFTA00030569.pdf
This document is a formal response from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team regarding 22 specific discovery requests made on October 13, 2020. The government addresses requests for Epstein's diary, the 'Billionaires Playboy Club' manuscript, flight logs (implied in broader requests but not itemized), and the identities of minor victims, often denying immediate production based on Rule 16 restrictions or asserting that materials have already been produced. The letter also discusses the handling of potential 'Brady' and 'Giglio' materials, stating that impeachment evidence will be produced closer to trial.
EFTA00029540.pdf
This document is an Opinion & Order by District Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court denies Maxwell's motions to dismiss the indictment based on Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement, statute of limitations arguments, and pre-indictment delay. However, the Court grants Maxwell's motion to sever the perjury charges from the sex trafficking-related charges, ruling they must be tried separately to ensure a fair trial. The Court also orders the parties to negotiate a schedule for outstanding pretrial disclosures.
EFTA00025081.pdf
This document is an email thread from November 2019 involving personnel from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The participants are attempting to schedule a meeting to 'catch up' on the Epstein case, specifically to discuss an interview that took place the previous week. The thread details scheduling conflicts involving travel to 'CLS' and 'White Plains'.
EFTA00024830.pdf
An email thread from December 19, 2018, between officials at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The Chief of the Public Corruption Unit asks a colleague for a brief discussion before they leave for White Plains ('WP'), regarding 'Epstein'. The colleague replies that they are already in White Plains and suggests a cell phone call.
EFTA00022091.pdf
This Opinion & Order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York addresses multiple pretrial motions filed by defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Alison J. Nathan denies most of the motions, including those seeking dismissal based on Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement, statute of limitations, and pre-indictment delay, but grants the motion to sever the perjury counts for a separate trial.
EFTA00022047.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 13-14, 2020, discussing technical discovery tasks for the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The correspondence involves the transfer and database indexing of files, specifically 26,164 documents from the 'FBI Files from Florida Office' and boxes of files from the 'USAO-SDFL' (Southern District of Florida). The participants are coordinating the loading of these materials into a 'US v Epstein' Relativity database and physical delivery of drives to 1 St. Andrews (SDNY office).
EFTA00020907.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 2019 involving personnel from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) and redacted recipients. The subject is 'Epstein catch up,' and the discussion focuses on scheduling a meeting to discuss a recent interview. The participants attempt to coordinate schedules between Monday evening and Wednesday morning, with one participant noting they will be in White Plains on Wednesday.
EFTA00020261.pdf
This document is an Opinion & Order by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court denied Maxwell's motions to dismiss the indictment based on Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement, statute of limitations, and pre-indictment delay. However, the Court granted Maxwell's motion to sever the perjury charges, ruling they will be tried separately from the sex trafficking-related counts to ensure a fair trial.
EFTA00020231.pdf
This document is an email dated June 25, 2020, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to a redacted recipient. The email discusses the imminent presentation of an indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell to a grand jury in White Plains on the following Monday. The sender apologizes for the short notice regarding the review of the indictment document.
EFTA00016904.pdf
This document contains an email chain between US Attorney's Office prosecutors (including Jason Swergold) and defense attorneys (Aida Leisenring) regarding discovery materials related to the 'July 23 Incident' (Epstein's first suicide attempt). The defense requests access to hallway video surveillance, photos/video of Cell 124, and physical inspection of an 'orange rope.' The prosecution confirms they are investigating if these items exist or were preserved, specifically noting skepticism about the need to physically inspect the rope.
EFTA00016403.pdf
This document is an email chain from December 2019 between the US Attorney's Office (specifically the Narcotics Unit handling the Epstein case) and defense attorney Aida Leisenring. The defense is requesting access to video surveillance of the hallway and Cell 124, as well as a physical inspection of the 'orange rope' related to the July 23 incident (Epstein's suicide attempt). The prosecution confirms they are investigating the existence/preservation of these items but challenges the necessity of physically inspecting the rope.
EFTA00016401.pdf
This document is an email thread from December 2019 between defense attorney Aida Leisenring and federal prosecutors (USANYS) regarding discovery materials related to the 'July 23 incident' involving Jeffrey Epstein. The defense requests access to video surveillance of the hallway, photos/video of Cell 124, and physical inspection of an 'orange rope'. The prosecution confirms they are investigating the existence/preservation of these items but questions the necessity of physically inspecting the rope.
EFTA00013272.pdf
Court order from April 2019 in the case of United States v. Nicholas Tartaglione (Epstein's future cellmate). Judge Kenneth Karas orders the Bureau of Prisons to withhold attorney work-product and legal visitation logs from federal prosecutors to protect the defendant's legal strategy. The order applies to the MCC, MDC, and potential transfer facilities like Westchester County Correctional Facility.
EFTA00009864.pdf
This document is an email chain from December 2020 involving the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. A Deputy Chief from the White Plains Division is requesting a final copy of the BOP's 'Psychological Reconstruction of Inmate Jeffrey Epstein' and the MCC's response. The stated purpose is to evaluate discovery obligations for the capital phase of the Tartaglione trial. The most recent email indicates that the request is being processed through the Central Office.
DOJ-OGR-00000117.tif
This document outlines several motions made by 'Maxwell' in a legal proceeding, including motions to dismiss perjury counts, sever counts, strike indictment language, compel discovery, and dismiss all counts related to grand jury indictments. It also states that Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement from September 2007 does not prevent the current prosecution.
DOJ-OGR-00015252.tif
This document is a list of professional activities and engagements, likely for an academic or legal professional, spanning from 1998 to 2000. It details various conferences, lectures, meetings, and academic affiliations across numerous universities, legal associations, and scientific organizations in the United States and internationally. The topics covered include memory, psychology, law, criminal defense, and wrongful convictions.
DOJ-OGR-00020761.jpg
This document is page 2 of a court order filed on April 16, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court summarizes its rulings, denying Maxwell's motions to dismiss charges based on Epstein's Florida Non-Prosecution Agreement, untimeliness, vagueness, and grand jury venue issues. However, the Court grants Maxwell's motion to sever the perjury counts, ruling they will be tried separately from the sex trafficking/Mann Act charges.
DOJ-OGR-00002331.jpg
This is the conclusion page of a legal motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team on January 25, 2021, arguing for the dismissal of her indictment. The defense claims a Sixth Amendment violation due to the systematic underrepresentation of Black and Hispanic jurors in the selection pool and alleges the government rushed her arrest for publicity reasons to coincide with the anniversary of the Epstein indictment.
DOJ-OGR-00002329(1).jpg
This legal document, filed on January 25, 2021, presents an analysis by a 'Mr. Martin' concerning the underrepresentation of Black and Hispanic jurors. The analysis compares the demographic composition of the 'White Plains qualified wheel' (juror pool) to the eligible juror populations of the Manhattan Division and the entire Southern District of New York, finding significant disparities. This argument is being made in the context of a case involving 'Epstein's New York residence,' which is located in the Manhattan Division.
DOJ-OGR-00002328.jpg
This document is page 8 of a legal filing from January 25, 2021, in the case of Ms. Maxwell. The text argues that the jury selection process in White Plains systematically underrepresented Black and Hispanic individuals, thereby violating Ms. Maxwell's Sixth Amendment right to a fair cross-section. The argument relies on the three-part test established by the Supreme Court in Duren v. Missouri to demonstrate a prima facie violation.
DOJ-OGR-00002328(1).jpg
This legal document, filed on January 25, 2021, is a portion of a legal argument on behalf of Ms. Maxwell. It contends that her Sixth Amendment rights were violated due to the systematic underrepresentation of Black and Hispanic individuals in the jury selected from White Plains. The document cites the three-part test established by the Supreme Court in *Duren v. Missouri* to support the claim of a prima facie violation of the fair cross-section requirement.
DOJ-OGR-00002327.jpg
This legal document is an argument on behalf of defendant Ms. Maxwell, challenging the composition of the grand jury that indicted her. It cites an analysis by jury expert Jeffrey Martin from a similar case, United States v. Balde, which found significant underrepresentation of Black and Hispanic persons in the White Plains jury wheel. The argument posits that since Ms. Maxwell's grand jury was drawn from the same system, her Sixth Amendment right to a grand jury selected from a fair cross-section of the community was violated.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity