DOJ-OGR-00018463.jpg
555 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
555 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a legal argument between defense attorney Ms. Sternheim and the Court regarding the admissibility of evidence—specifically an email—under the doctrine of 'past recollection recorded.' The Judge questions what specific details the witness failed to recall that would necessitate admitting the prior record.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Sternheim | Defense Attorney |
Arguing regarding the admissibility of evidence and 'past recollection recorded'.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, questioning the defense's rationale for admitting evidence.
|
| Ms. Pomerantz | Prosecutor (implied) |
Referenced by the Court regarding an argument she made about the witness's recall.
|
| Unnamed Witness | Witness |
Female witness whose testimony and memory recall are the subject of the legal debate.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| DOJ |
Referenced in footer stamp (DOJ-OGR).
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
Court hearing regarding evidentiary rulings in Case 1:20-cr-00330.
Southern District of New York Court
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by 'Southern District Reporters' and case number format.
|
Relationships (2)
Dialogue in transcript.
Court references Pomerantz's argument.
Key Quotes (3)
"Past recollection recorded does not have to be inconsistent."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018463.jpg
Quote #1
"what is it that the witness could not recall well enough to testify fully and accurately?"Source
DOJ-OGR-00018463.jpg
Quote #2
"the implied discrepancy was whether pictures were actually sent, but the email doesn't go to that"Source
DOJ-OGR-00018463.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document