DOJ-OGR-00002824.jpg
769 KB
Extraction Summary
1
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court filing (order/opinion regarding motion to dismiss)
File Size:
769 KB
Summary
This document is page 3 of a court filing (likely an opinion or order) in the case of United States v. Schulte (Case 1:17-cr-00548). It discusses Schulte's motion to dismiss his indictment regarding the alleged transmission of national defense information to WikiLeaks. Schulte argues that the White Plains grand jury venire violated his constitutional rights by failing to represent a fair cross-section of African American and Hispanic American populations. Note: While the prompt identifies this as 'Epstein-related,' the text exclusively concerns Joshua Schulte; however, this document may be part of a larger FOIA production covering SDNY cases or MCC New York issues.
People (1)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Schulte | Defendant |
Moving to dismiss the indictment based on jury selection demographics; charged with transmitting national defense info.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Government |
Sought and obtained superseding indictment; opposing Schulte's motion.
|
|
| WikiLeaks |
Entity to which Schulte allegedly transmitted national defense information.
|
|
| United States District Court for the Southern District of New York |
The jurisdiction where the case is being heard (implied by 'Southern District of New York' in the footer context).
|
Timeline (2 events)
June 8, 2020
Government sought and obtained a third superseding Indictment.
White Plains courthouse
Government
Grand Jury (White Plains)
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location where the grand jury sat and returned the superseding indictment.
|
|
|
Jurisdiction mentioned in the citation for the Amended Plan.
|
Key Quotes (3)
"The Indictment charges Schulte with nine criminal counts relating to his alleged transmission of national defense information to WikiLeaks."Source
DOJ-OGR-00002824.jpg
Quote #1
"He primarily contends that the White Plains grand jury venire... did not reflect a fair cross-section of the African American and Hispanic American populations in the community."Source
DOJ-OGR-00002824.jpg
Quote #2
"Schulte argues that the Government’s decision to seek the Indictment from White Plains was improperly made."Source
DOJ-OGR-00002824.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document